Following on the review of how well the housing market is doing, I thought I would take a look at employment.

As I’ve been talking about the housing recovery for some time, I thought it would be worth giving it a more detailed look. I don’t intend to get very quantitative here, but there are a number of charts that illustrate just how far we’ve come. First, let’s take a look at housing affordability.

One of the wonderful things about the digital age is the emergence of mash-ups, where people combine elements of existing art in new ways. The idea has been around for decades, of course, but the Internet and digital technology have made it even easier to create and distribute.

Looked at in financial terms, the Federal Reserve (Fed) has done its bit by expanding the monetary base. There is quite a bit of money ready to go, and when it gets put into the economy, we will see inflation. But first, we need consumers and business to borrow and spend that money. That hasn’t happened yet; when it does, then we’ll need to worry about inflation. So it gives us a list of things to watch for:

1. The unemployment rate decreases. As excess labor is absorbed, companies will be forced to raise wages, which in turn will increase spending power. This is a necessary condition for inflation to move significantly higher, barring a rise in input costs, such as an oil shock. This will also signal increased growth, which should lead businesses to start investing again.
2. Banks start lending/consumers start borrowing again. This will probably lag increased employment, as people won’t/can’t, borrow without jobs, but once employment recovers, borrowing will most likely be close behind.
3. Growth in gross domestic product (GDP) ticks up. This will be an inevitable consequence of 1 and 2, but it is still worth watching as a leading indicator. Growth absorbs labor, materials, and everything else, and by increasing demand, it will certainly stoke inflation.

Even when some or all of these occur, inflation will not necessarily be on the immediate horizon, as there is still quite a bit of slack to work through—but it will be getting close. At that point, we should also see bond yields start to increase, which brings us to the investment implications.

Because we know inflation will increase eventually, any investments intended for more than a year or so should bear that in mind. For fixed income, shorter durations both limit the price risk and provide the opportunity to reinvest sooner at potentially higher rates. For equities, buying stocks that may potentially respond favorably to inflation, such as real estate investment trusts or commodity stocks, might make sense. For people who own or plan to buy homes, it would make sense to lock in today’s low rates.

None of this is to say that inflation is imminent—it is not. At some point, though, growth will resume, and the excess capacity that we presently have will be used up. As I have said, I believe that the U.S. economy has started a sustainable recovery, and if it is not derailed by actions from Washington, DC, that recovery may well result in inflation sooner than anyone now thinks. If so, that will actually be a very positive outcome, as it will mean we are finally through the aftermath of the financial crisis and into a more normal world.

Investments in commodities may have greater volatility than investments in traditional securities, particularly if the instruments involve leverage. The value of commodity-linked derivative instruments may be affected by changes in overall market movements, commodity index volatility, changes in interest rates, or factors affecting a particular industry or commodity, such as drought, floods, weather, livestock disease, embargoes, tariffs, and international economic, political, and regulatory developments. Use of leveraged commodity-linked derivatives creates an opportunity for increased return but, at the same time, creates the possibility for greater loss.

Real estate investments are subject to a high degree of risk because of general economic or local market conditions; changes in supply or demand; competing properties in an area; changes in interest rates; and changes in tax, real estate, environmental, or zoning laws and regulations. REIT units/shares fluctuate in value and may be redeemed for more or less than the original amount invested.

The economic slowdown on the financial crisis, combined with rapidly declining asset values, put the economy at risk of deflation. For reasons I discussed in the last post, the Federal Reserve (Fed) is actually trying to create inflation as a preferable alternative to deflation.

There is not a lot in the way of breaking news today, which is a good thing, but I think two articles are worth a look. They illustrate that there really is a healing process under way and that, despite all of the kvetching (of which I am certainly guilty), we really are making progress.

In part 1 of this post, I talked about what inflation is and how a moderate level has actually been good for the economy over the past couple of decades. That changed in 2008. Asset prices, particularly in housing, had inflated to an unsustainable level. The inflation measure the Federal Reserve (Fed) had been watching was based more on consumer consumption prices and less on asset prices. The asset price inflation got out of control and eventually collapsed. Because much of the financial system at that time was exposed to those asset prices, a financial crisis ensued.

I’ve said it before and will say it again: the debt ceiling debate, coming shortly, is the real thing we need to worry about. The deal over the fiscal cliff settled the immediate risk to the economy—although everyone’s taxes went up, they went up much less than they could have, and spending power was therefore preserved. Spending cuts, which will hit at the same time as the debt ceiling, will also be a headwind to the economy, but they are necessary and can be phased in to cause minimal harm. The one thing that could really blow us up is failure to resolve the debt ceiling issue. This is why it is actually encouraging to see active planning for failure. Given the risk, we should have a plan.

I talked in a previous post about the political options —how the Senate has, twice now, cut a deal with White House approval and essentially dared the House to vote it down. That remains, in my opinion, the most plausible option, but there are others, which range from the serious to the absurd. Let’s start with the serious:

1. A Senate deal forced through the House. This has been done successfully before, but it looks more questionable this time, as the House will be expecting it. Each time, it has been more difficult and resulted in a shorter-term solution. There may be one more bite on the apple, but it is not certain. Feasibility: Medium to high, but any solution would be short term and probably partial.
2. Scrip could be issued instead of actual cash payments once the Treasury hits the wall, enabling operations to continue despite the debt ceiling. The scrip would not be debt because it would not pay interest and would not mature, but it would be a cash alternative that would be transferable, probably to financial institutions, at a high percentage of face value. This method was used by California in 2009. Although there would certainly be problems with this solution, there is precedent—it worked in California—and there appear to be no insurmountable constitutional problems. This proposal is detailed in an article in today’s New York Times. Feasibility: Pretty high.
3. The trillion-dollar coin. Among others, Paul Krugman has proposed that a platinum coin with a denomination of $1 trillion be issued and deposited at the Federal Reserve, which would then transfer the money to the Treasury’s account. Voila! No more problem. There is apparently a clause (intended for commemorative coins) that allows the Treasury to mint platinum coins of any value it wants. It’s tough to know even where to start discussing the problems with this option, but it does seem to be legal, and economically it is not that different from what we are doing now. The problems would be political, and they would be big. Feasibility: Low.
4. The president could plausibly invoke the 14th Amendment to lift the debt ceiling, based on the language “the validity of the public debt of the United States . . . shall not be questioned.” The White House recently ruled this out, but it could remain an option if necessary. The downside? The questionable legality, the almost certain legal challenge, and the potential constitutional crisis would not really reduce the uncertainty. Feasibility: Very low.
5. A grand bargain. Both sides could come together on a deal that raises the debt ceiling and has a credible mix of spending cuts and tax reform to create a sustainable solution over time. Feasibility: Very low, unfortunately.

There has been a lot of uncertainty in the economy and a lot of volatility in the financial markets. Recently, that has been good; the bump after the fiscal cliff deal took us to a five-year high. Clearly, the expectation in the stock market is that uncertainty has been reduced, problems have been solved, and we have clear sailing ahead.

One question that has come up repeatedly when I talk with advisors and clients is whether inflation is coming. The answer is simple, if perhaps unexpected: hopefully, it is. What? Why on earth would we want inflation?