What Can We Learn from Yesterday’s Market Melt-Up?

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA, CAIA, MAI

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Sep 9, 2015 3:15:43 PM

and tagged Commentary

Leave a comment

market melt-upWhen markets drop, I always get calls from advisors and the media asking what the heck is going on. Volatility (at least when combined with a market decline) is often considered evidence that it’s time to worry—that something is broken. It makes sense; after all, if you’re losing money on your investments, something isn’t right. But, somehow, I don’t see the same reaction when there’s a market melt-up. No one called me yesterday to ask what was going on, anyway.

Maybe they should have. Both sharp drops and sharp increases are responses to the same problem: uncertainty. If we think of the stock market as a mechanism for matching investors with investments, then setting accurate valuations is critical. When values swing either way, it means that investors don’t really know how much opportunities are worth. And that’s a problem.  

Uncertainty is now driving the market

Anyone who reads this blog knows that I am basically constructive on U.S. markets, though I did think we might see a much deeper pullback in the short term than we have seen. Yesterday’s rapid bounce back up does not really indicate that the volatility has ended, however. It’s just that—for that moment—investors decided that prices had been driven too low.

In other words, I have been worried about uncertainty, and the bounce back actually reinforces to me that uncertainty is now driving the market. What would it take to resolve the uncertainty? Barring convincing economic resolutions for the U.S. or China, which I don’t think we’re going to get in the foreseeable future, the answer will likely come from market evidence.

Resolving uncertainty: An analysis of S&P 500 support levels

Since the start of the year, the S&P 500 has bounced between roughly 2,000 and 2,100. In 2014, it ranged from 1,800 to just above 2,000. Over that two-year period, the 2,000 level marked first a ceiling and then a floor. There is, of course, no compelling theoretical reason why round numbers should have any special effect on the market, but the evidence shows they do.

One way for the market to show that uncertainty has been resolved, then, would be for the S&P 500 to break convincingly above 2,000. As of yesterday and even this morning, that looked very doable. (As I’m putting the finishing touches on this post, markets are now in slightly negative territory. Did I mention uncertainty?)

Even better, of course, would be for the market to move to new highs (i.e., 2,135 for the S&P 500), but a sustained break above 2,000 would be a necessary and important first step. Watch the market over the next couple of weeks to see if it can make that leap.

Beyond the simple 2,000 level, another way to look at resolving uncertainty is for the market to move back above long-term trend levels. Here the news is more discouraging, as all longer-term moving averages are well above 2,000, so there are no real intermediate steps before we get there.

The same, unfortunately, applies to valuations. My valuation analysis from the other day still holds. And, again, we find that there are no real support levels from a valuation perspective that could provide more certainty before we get back to the 2,000 level.

So far, my analysis deals with a potential return to growth. What about continued decline? The analysis is pretty much the same, but in reverse. From a market level perspective, 1,900 on the S&P 500 appears to be the next support level down, as we saw last month and also in October of last year, when markets briefly dropped below that level before bouncing back. A sustained break below 1,900 would be evidence of a potentially renewed downward trend.

The bottom line

As encouraging as yesterday’s surge was, we remain in a very uncertain market environment. I think we can expect to see market levels oscillate between 1,900 and 2,000, until investors, as a group, decide whether they are confident—or not. Large one-day moves in either direction do not, unfortunately, indicate a problem solved.

Upcoming Appearances

Tune in to CNBC's Power Lunch on Wednesday, February 26, between 1:45 and 3:00 P.M. ET to hear Brad talk about the market. Exact interview time will be updated once confirmed. Check local listings for availability. 

Tune in to Bloomberg Radio's Bloomberg Businessweek on Friday, February 28, at 3:45 P.M. ET to hear Brad talk about the market. Stream the show live at https://www.bloombergradio.com/, listen through SiriusXM 119, or download Bloomberg's app, Bloomberg Radio+.

Subscribe via E-mail

New call-to-action
Crash-Test Investing
Commonwealth Independent Advisor

Hot Topics

Have a Question?

New Call-to-action

Conversations

Archives

see all

Subscribe

Disclosure

The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly into an index.

The MSCI EAFE Index (Europe, Australasia, Far East) is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.  

Third party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided at these websites. Information on such sites, including third party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.

Member FINRASIPC

Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®