The Independent Market Observer

The Old World: Where We Came From

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA®, CFP®

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Nov 16, 2018 9:59:09 AM

and tagged Commentary

Leave a comment

I closed my post two days ago with the observation that the now world—the world optimized around economics—has changed significantly from what came before it. It really became different this time, within the lifetime of most of the readers of this blog. To prove it, I offer this picture.

old world 

Most readers of a certain age will recognize this immediately. This was the duck-and-cover drill you practiced in school to protect yourself in the event of a nuclear holocaust. We didn’t do this at my school; instead, we went into the hall, leaned against a wall, and covered our heads with our hands. When the Russians launched, we would be ready.

In retrospect it seems absurd and almost obscene, but at the time—for a six-year-old—it was normal. It reflected the reality of the world, and that world was defined by politics and political confrontations.

old world 

From four worlds to one

Even the maps reflected that reality. Remember the one-world map from my last post? This is a four-world map, which reflects the political—and economic, but we didn’t think about that much then—divisions of the old world. You had the U.S. and its allies and the Soviet Union and its allies. China was off by itself. All were separate worlds in many ways. Note that West Germany (the FRG) and East Germany (the GDR) were also separated, when now they are just Germany.

Almost as interesting is what the map doesn’t show. India and Africa are grayed out, almost as if they don’t matter, and from a political—and economic—perspective, they really didn’t.

When we look at the underlying assumptions, this is clearly a political map. Economics, population, and all the other factors are subsumed into politics—as was the way in the old world.

All that changed, starting in 1979 when China opened up. This added a billion people to the global economy, hundreds of millions of whom were working age. At a stroke, labor became much more available. The change wasn’t immediately apparent, of course, because the overarching political structure—the confrontation between the U.S. and the Soviet Union—persisted.  

old world 

That broke in 1989, when the Berlin Wall came down, and the political gridlock broke as well. Suddenly, the political reality changed, and the new world had to find a new defining principle. With the U.S. the dominant power, and with China open for business, economics came to be that new principle, which brought us to the world we have now.

From politics to economics

That transition, from politics to economics, did not just occur between nations but also within them. In Europe, for example, the creation of the European Coal and Steel Community was followed over the decades by increasing economic integration, to the point where the EU now largely functions as a single economic entity, including—for many countries—a single currency.

Here in the U.S., the transition was just as dramatic. The airline industry, for example, used to be strictly regulated, with airlines restricted as to where and when they could fly. This led to effective monopolies and high prices. Now, of course, regulations are much lower, and so are prices. The financial industry, which used to have minimum commissions and regulated interest rates, now can offer variable pricing that serves a much wider range of customers. The examples go on and on.

The transition from a political world to an economic world really did make things different—and better—for citizens, for consumers, and for countries. It also changed the world for investors. Next week, we will look at just what the new world has meant for us as investors over the past several decades. Spoiler alert: It’s all been good.

Subscribe via Email

New call-to-action
Crash-Test Investing

Hot Topics

New Call-to-action



see all



The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

The VIX (CBOE Volatility Index) measures the market’s expectation of 30-day volatility across a wide range of S&P 500 options.

The forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio divides the current share price of the index by its estimated future earnings.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.


Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®