The Independent Market Observer

The Next World: Back to the Old World?

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA®, CFP®

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Nov 27, 2018 3:18:58 PM

and tagged Commentary

Leave a comment

We closed the last post in this series on the note that while the now world (i.e., the world we live in) has benefited enormously from the economic freedom that came with the new world, changes are underway that might limit that freedom—to our economic detriment. As politics comes to the fore again, economics may once again take second place.

To begin, let’s go back to the map we started with, with all of its embedded assumptions. This is the world we live in today, at least from a U.S. perspective. It is not, however, how China sees it.

next world

China, I suspect, sees the world something like the map below.

next world

Note the embedded assumptions here: this is still one world, economically open. But here we see China at the center, with everything else revolving around it. This is the world China would like to see. It is one where it can benefit from free trade and everything that goes with it, but China clearly dominates the world. In other words, China likes the world as it is but wants to change places with the U.S.

A world divided

China has history and demographics behind it. For millennia, China was the largest and most advanced society in the world. Indeed, China often refers to itself as the Middle Kingdom, the land at the center of the world. China is also the world’s largest country by population. From a Chinese perspective, China should be at the center of the world.

The U.S., of course, doesn’t see it that way. And this is where we find ourselves right now. As China and the U.S. face off, the structure of the world could become increasingly political. In the end, we could find ourselves, once again, in a world divided by politics. Companies would face smaller markets and less available and more expensive labor and capital. Business conditions—interest rates and stock valuations—could find themselves retracing the path of the past 40 years, back to the levels of the old world.

This is not, however, an immediate problem. The immediate problem is how the confrontation is likely to evolve in the short term, which will determine whether we have a bigger problem in the long term. Here, we have some data that can help us figure that out.

Headed toward a war?

The first option—and one that has generated an increasing number of headlines—is war. China and the U.S. are, the headlines go, locked in a “Thucydides trap,” so named for the Greek historian who described the wars between a rising Athens and Sparta. When a rising power confronts a dominant power, the narrative goes, the only possible outcome is war. The most recent example, from the last century, is Germany and Great Britain. With China rising and the U.S. unwilling to give way, will they have to fight it out?

If they do, the U.S. has an incredible advantage, not just in forces but also in operational experience. As the chart below shows, from a spending point of view, the U.S. outweighs everyone else—including China. This also does not take into account the U.S. allies, including Japan and South Korea, as well as Taiwan. China is certainly building up its military power, but it is not there yet. A war is likely at least a decade away, if it ever happens.

next world

Back to the old world?

Instead, the confrontation, as we are seeing, is likely to be political and economic. For China to continue its rise, it will need to maintain and expand its economic growth and international presence. How—and whether—it can do that, and what the U.S. does in response, will determine whether the next world reverts to the old world or not. We will take a look at that next.

Subscribe via Email

New call-to-action
Crash-Test Investing

Hot Topics

New Call-to-action



see all



The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

The VIX (CBOE Volatility Index) measures the market’s expectation of 30-day volatility across a wide range of S&P 500 options.

The forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio divides the current share price of the index by its estimated future earnings.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.


Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®