The Independent Market Observer

Iceland: Lessons in Political Economy

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA®, CFP®

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Aug 29, 2018 3:54:32 PM

and tagged Commentary

Leave a comment

IcelandI just got back from 10 days in Iceland with my family. It was a wonderful trip. We saw and hiked waterfalls, glaciers, and volcano craters. We also went on a whale watch, where we got within yards of humpback whales and saw a very rare whale pod (not normally seen in Icelandic waters). As a family, we had a great time—highly recommend!

As an economist, though, I also had a great time. I mentioned before I left that Iceland had a financial collapse in 2008. I was interested to see, 10 years on, how the recovery was going. In essence, from a tourist’s point of view, 2008 might never have happened. We kind of take that for granted here in the U.S., with markets hitting new highs. But Iceland got hit harder than almost any other country. Good to see it has recovered and prospered—but that is not the only interesting part.

Why everything costs a lot

One of the first things I noted when we got there was the prices. They were crazy expensive—some two to three times higher than Boston, which itself is not cheap. A beer will run you $20, and prices go up from there. I had to turn off the frugal Scottish part of my brain for this trip. Why? Well, the simple reason is that Iceland is a small island, with a small population. It can’t manufacture everything it needs, particularly food, so it has to be imported. Since Iceland is thousands of miles away, that costs a lot, and there are not enough people for efficiencies of scale. Hence, everything costs a lot.

Stepping back a bit, though, there is one big begged question in that set of statements: why can't Iceland manufacture what it needs? Particularly given that, in the past, Iceland did just that because it had to. What’s different this time?

An economy shaped by economic and trade factors

This brings us to the Iceland Industry Museum in Akureyri, up north, and the National Museum of Iceland in Reykjavik. The industrial museum (which was a tough sell for my son, I have to say) has multiple exhibits on different industries, including clothing and printing. All exhibits conclude with the statement that when the economy was opened to imports in the 1960s and 1970s, the Icelandic companies went out of business.

The National Museum has sections on how Denmark, which ruled Iceland at one time, kept it as a captive market and limited trading to Danish companies and ships. Iceland has been shaped over its history by economic and trade factors—2008 was only the most recent iteration.

Parallels with the U.S.

I explained all this to my family, and they were fascinated. More or less. They got a little bit more interested, though, when I pointed out that this scenario is exactly what is happening in the U.S. today. When you look at the reason Icelandic industries shut down in the 1960s and 1970s, it is because they were more expensive than the imports, and buyers preferred cheaper to more expensive. When you look back to the earlier eras, Iceland suffered from trade restrictions by Denmark and by its own government—which is ultimately why those restrictions were removed. The parallels with the U.S., today, are more than clear.

Even more parallels with the U.S. become clear when you look around. Free trade has actually resulted in a much higher standard of living as the economy adapted. Icelanders have fruit to eat, not just fish. They have products, like cars, that could not be economically manufactured in a country that size. They have cheaper clothes. Trade allows them to have better lives, and they have adapted their economy to reflect what they do well, rather than trying to do it all. While there were costs, in the form of lost jobs, the ultimate outcome was better for almost everyone. Once more, there are lessons here for the current U.S. policy debate.

A lesson in free trade

Not sure how much of that got through to my son, but I will keep trying. As an economist, though, what I saw in Iceland was a thriving open economy that depended on free trade. This, in my opinion, bears a lot of resemblance to the U.S.


Subscribe via Email

Crash-Test Investing

Hot Topics



New Call-to-action

Conversations

Archives

see all

Subscribe


Disclosure

The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

The VIX (CBOE Volatility Index) measures the market’s expectation of 30-day volatility across a wide range of S&P 500 options.

The forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio divides the current share price of the index by its estimated future earnings.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.

Member FINRASIPC

Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®