The Independent Market Observer

From Integration to Collapse: Technology and Global Trends

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA®, CFP®

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Jan 28, 2016 3:08:56 PM

and tagged Commentary

Leave a comment

technologyAs we discussed yesterday, a number of countries depend on oil money to keep their populations happy, and lower oil prices are threatening those governments’ legitimacy. They lost control over the pricing mechanism as free markets took over, spurred by new technology—in this case, fracking.

This scenario is neither new nor unique. If you remember, the collapse of the Soviet Union was driven in large part by a similar decline in the price of oil. With revenues falling and a perceived need to match U.S. military spending, public support for the regime withered. There was, however, another factor in play: the Soviet government's loosening grip on information. A new technology, the fax machine, enabled dissidents to communicate more effectively than they had before. In fact, looking back a couple of decades later, that technology was probably the biggest factor.

In any case, the loss of government control led to loss of legitimacy—and collapse.

New challenges to government arise

I would argue that this process has spread and accelerated, making government an increasingly competitive enterprise. Just as large companies have been successfully challenged—IBM, for example, is nowhere near as dominant as it once was—governmental monopolies are also fading. Where regional governments might once have seemed too risky (think Scotland and Catalonia), the greater availability of information and ability to operate at a smaller scale are changing that. The trend has been toward more integration (the European Union itself is a case in point), but that trend is poised to change.

The Middle East is a prime example of states breaking down in the face of new technologies that empower smaller groups. Existing states, such as Syria, were largely imposed by the West, with little relation to the underlying groups of people. Those people and other factions are now more able to move out from under existing governments. With a couple of exceptions, such as Egypt and Iran, which have long histories as nations and states, these trends suggest that we’ll see considerably more Syrias in the future.

It also seems that the Islamic State (a term I use for lack of a better one) is potentially a model for the future there. If we think of states competing as companies do, ISIS is clearly a start-up that has established a competitive and defensible market position, one that has demonstrated a clear value proposition for people around the world. Although we don’t have to like that, we do have to deal with it. But the options for the surrounding states are limited, for exactly the same reasons old-line companies have difficulty dealing with disruptive competition.

What does this mean for the U.S.?

A few points stand out:

  • We can expect more disintegration abroad, as this trend is only getting started.
  • ISIS is not going away, and it could end up replacing one or more of the states that now constitute the Middle East.
  • The same type of trend that is operating abroad is also operating here.

Much of the current decay in U.S. politics is caused by the breakdown of established institutions (i.e., the political parties). Thanks to new technology, Individuals (like Donald Trump) or groups that do not feel well served by the existing structures (like the Bernie Sanders campaign) are now better able to do something about it. Populism has been tried before in the U.S., but the large pools of aggrieved voters combined with modern technology may well have the same kind of disruptive effect on American politics as elsewhere.

I’m reminded of the apocryphal Eisenhower quote “Things are more like they are now than they ever have been before.” We can expect to see the continuing breakdown of institutions and the empowerment of individuals and small groups. Here in the U.S., with our flexible, open society, we are well equipped to weather and even benefit from such changes. Most of the rest of the world will be less lucky. 

  Subscribe to the Independent Market Observer

Subscribe via Email

Crash-Test Investing

Hot Topics

New Call-to-action



see all



The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

The VIX (CBOE Volatility Index) measures the market’s expectation of 30-day volatility across a wide range of S&P 500 options.

The forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio divides the current share price of the index by its estimated future earnings.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.


Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®