The Independent Market Observer

1/23/13 –“India Warns Kashmiris to Prepare for Nuclear War”

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA®, CFP®

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Jan 23, 2013 10:19:58 AM

and tagged Europe, Yesterday's News

Leave a comment

When I saw the above headline in today’s New York Times (page A3), I have to admit I was taken aback. All of the discussions I have heard about nuclear war recently have been metaphorical, typically centering on how Congress is dealing with something. This one isn’t. Reading the article is scarily reminiscent of civil defense drills that I am just old enough to remember—when we stood in the central hallway of the school, facing the wall with our hands over our heads.

I couldn’t have asked for a better reminder that even as economic risks recede—and they are receding—there are a number of geopolitical risks that will come back to fill that worry-space. The relationship between India and Pakistan is certainly one risk; another is Japan and China, where, as of yesterday, both countries were sending fighter jets to the disputed Senkaku/Daioyu islands.

I gave an internal talk at Commonwealth yesterday about the economy and the markets, and I pointed out that the U.S. economy is improving in a big way, using data I have discussed here in the blog, but that risks remain, principally stemming from Washington, DC. As I said to my colleagues yesterday, though, even that risk seems to be receding, as both sides appear less willing to force the issue; this is evidenced by a Wall Street Journal headline today: “Obama Would Accept Stopgap Debt Extension.” Following my presentation, a coworker asked an excellent question about the risks—on both sides—to my analysis.

The upside risk is relatively easy: a full, grand bargain that reduces the U.S. deficit to a sustainable level over a period of years, using a mix of taxes and spending cuts. If that could be done, it would unleash a torrent of business activity, including hiring and investment, which could turn the current slow recovery into a boom. I hope that happens.

The downside risks are more numerous. We’ve talked about the domestic political risks, which seem to be receding, but the geopolitical risks seem to be stepping up even as the economic risks recede. India and Pakistan; Iran, Syria, and Saudi Arabia; Japan and China—all of these are potential war risks in the near future. Europe seems to have laid the groundwork for economic recovery, but it is starting to look weak politically. The prime minister of Great Britain has announced that that country will hold a referendum on leaving the European Union, France is coming into increasing conflict with Germany, Silvio Berlusconi is attempting a comeback in Italy . . . the list goes on and on.

And yet, with all of these risks, I take away two major things. The first is that there have always been risks like this, and sometimes bad things happen, but we deal with them and move on. The systemic risks seem to be receding, and the other risks are normal. Let’s not overreact.

The second is that I am deeply thankful I live in the U.S. Our problems are mostly self-inflicted, under our control, and still relatively minor compared with those of many other countries. Could things be better? Of course, and, in fact, they are getting better. There is no other country in the world that is as well positioned, overall, as we are.

I started off with the warning of nuclear war and a brief reminiscence of civil defense drills. Within my memory, nuclear war was something that hung over the U.S. like a shroud. Nowadays, even mentioning the notion is something of a shock. Thirty years ago, the Soviet Union was a major threat. Now even as China expands, its interests are primarily economic, not military. Even with all our worries, we are in a much better place than we have been. Worth remembering.

Subscribe via Email

New call-to-action
Crash-Test Investing

Hot Topics

New Call-to-action



see all



The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

The VIX (CBOE Volatility Index) measures the market’s expectation of 30-day volatility across a wide range of S&P 500 options.

The forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio divides the current share price of the index by its estimated future earnings.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.


Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®