The Independent Market Observer

What’s Wrong with the Way We Measure Risk?

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA®, CFP®

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Dec 10, 2015 2:30:00 PM

and tagged Investing

Leave a comment

riskI shared this post earlier this year, and as we look ahead to a 2016 that could bring ongoing volatility, I think it’s a good reminder.

When we consider market returns, we often focus on average returns, assuming the downside will take care of itself. But I don’t think averages are the best way to express how portfolios may perform. In fact, I think this points to an even bigger problem: how we measure risk.

Problem #1: Averages

Consider Russian roulette. With five out of six chambers unloaded, the average chance of a good outcome is high. But the worst-case analysis tells a very different story. The average does not matter to me when I consider this particular downside.

Similarly, when we consider market returns, we tend to focus on average returns, often ignoring the potential downside. Indeed, we explicitly model this in our portfolio design, assuming that stocks will outperform in the long run.

Risk, we are told, is the price of higher returns. When we speak of risk in this context, though, we’re talking about variability, not capital loss. We’re also implicitly considering a long-term perspective, without defining what "long term" actually means or how it might conflict with other factors.

Problem #2: A focus on investments instead of the individual investor

Most investment math uses simplifying assumptions and applies them to the portfolio or the market. The statistics we see are inward looking and self-referential. They apply to the investments and not to the investor. There are good reasons for this simplified calculation:

  • It’s easier.
  • It provides a consistent basis for comparison.
  • These numbers are, in fact, useful in certain contexts.

I would argue, however, that in the most important context—the point of view of the individual investor—the numbers we often use don’t capture the most important aspects of risk.

For a retiree withdrawing 4 percent per year and facing inflation of 3 percent, for example, downside risks are paramount. With a net of 7 percent to make every year, large drawdowns at any point could cripple that person’s future life. Drawdowns matter.

Similarly, looking at average returns over historical time periods is useful, but how about looking at minimum annual returns over that time period? For example, if over the past 30 years you never saw a 10-year period with a return less than 4 percent in an asset class, would that be more compelling than a 30-year period with an asset class that had a similar return but with 10-year periods in which you actually lost money?

What does risk mean to you?

The standard solution to this problem is a risk tolerance questionnaire, which investors use to try to identify how much risk they are comfortable taking. But it is difficult to measure your tolerance for risk when you haven’t really defined what risk is.

The real question is this: How can we better measure and describe risk, and what will that mean for the investment process and results?

  Subscribe to the Independent Market Observer

Subscribe via Email

New call-to-action
Crash-Test Investing

Hot Topics

New Call-to-action



see all



The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

The VIX (CBOE Volatility Index) measures the market’s expectation of 30-day volatility across a wide range of S&P 500 options.

The forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio divides the current share price of the index by its estimated future earnings.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.


Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®