The Way We Measure Risk Is Wrong

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA, CAIA, MAI

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Mar 11, 2015 2:10:00 PM

and tagged Investing

Leave a comment

riskDiscussing returns over the next 10 years the other day, I closed with the thought that averages aren’t the best way to express how portfolios may perform. We will certainly talk about that today, but it’s emblematic of a much bigger problem: how we measure risk.

The trouble with averages

Consider Russian roulette. With five out of six chambers unloaded, on average, this is a winning bet. But the worst-case analysis tells a very different story. I don’t care what the average says when I consider the downside.

Similarly, when we consider market returns, we tend to focus on average returns, with a presumption that the downside will take care of itself. Indeed, we explicitly model this in our portfolio design, assuming that stocks will outperform in the long run.

Risk, we are told, is the price of higher returns. When we speak of risk in this context, though, we’re talking about variability, not capital loss. We’re also implicitly considering a long-term perspective, without defining what "long term" actually means or how it might conflict with other factors.

Focusing on the individual investor

Most investment math works like this. It uses simplifying assumptions and applies them to the portfolio or market. The statistics we see are inward looking and self-referential. They apply to the investments, and not to the investor.

There are good reasons for this. First, it’s easier. Second, it provides a consistent basis for comparison. Third, these numbers can indeed be useful in certain contexts.

I would argue, though, that in the most important context—that of the individual investor—the numbers we often use don’t capture the most important aspects of risk.

For a retiree, for example, withdrawing 4 percent per year and facing 3-percent inflation, downside risks are paramount. With a nut of 7 percent to make every year, large drawdowns at any point could cripple his or her entire future life. Drawdowns matter.

Similarly, looking at average returns over historical time periods is useful, but how about looking at minimum annual returns over that time period? For example, if over the past 30 years you never saw a 10-year period with a return less than 4 percent in an asset class, would that be more interesting than a 30-year period with a similar return but with 10-year periods where you actually lost money?

How do you define risk?

The standard response to this problem is a risk tolerance questionnaire, which investors use to try to identify how much risk they can take. But the title itself begs the question. How can you measure your tolerance for risk when you haven’t really defined what risk is?

The real question is this: How do we better measure and describe risk, and what does that mean for the investment process and results? We’ll talk about that tomorrow.

                        Subscribe to the Independent Market Observer            

Upcoming Appearances

Tune in to Bloomberg Radio's Bloomberg Businessweek on Friday, February 28, at 3:45 P.M. ET to hear Brad talk about the market. Stream the show live at https://www.bloombergradio.com/, listen through SiriusXM 119, or download Bloomberg's app, Bloomberg Radio+.

Tune into Yahoo Finance's The Final Round on Thursday, March 12, between 2:50 and 4:00 P.M. ET to hear Brad talk about the market. Exact interview time will be updated once confirmed. Watch at finance.yahoo.com

Subscribe via E-mail

New call-to-action
Crash-Test Investing
Commonwealth Independent Advisor

Hot Topics

Have a Question?

New Call-to-action

Conversations

Archives

see all

Subscribe

Disclosure

The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly into an index.

The MSCI EAFE Index (Europe, Australasia, Far East) is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.  

Third party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided at these websites. Information on such sites, including third party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.

Member FINRASIPC

Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®