The Independent Market Observer

What the Trade War Means to You

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA, CAIA, MAI

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Jan 29, 2019 1:32:17 PM

and tagged Commentary

Leave a comment

trade warI found a really interesting chart in my e-mail this morning. I think its implications extend well beyond what it actually shows, and so I thought it worth sharing. The chart is below, but the full version and discussion can be found on

Look beyond the surface

On the surface, this chart is about how much prices have changed in different categories over the past 20 years. You can see that average hourly earnings are up about 75 percent, and the average consumer price level is up by just over 50 percent. On the face of it, these figures suggest that the average worker has actually increased his or her purchasing power over that time period. So far, so good.

trade war 

When you look at the different categories of spending, however, some big trends emerge. Manufactured goods are flat or down significantly. Electronics and computers, for example, are down by 50 percent or more, while apparel, furniture, and cars are at about the same prices. In other words, anything that could be made at scale outside the U.S. got cheaper or stayed the same.

Goods and services that didn’t fit either of those criteria—scale or “globalizability” (to coin a word)—went up in price, by a lot. Medical costs, education, child care, and housing—none of those can be outsourced to lower-wage countries or be done at anything like the scale that manufacturing can.

What really saved the average worker, whose income went up by 75 percent, then, was the scalability and globalizability of much of what he or she buys. If manufactured goods had increased in price by nearly as much as everything else, the cost of living would be much higher, especially when compared with how much the average person’s purchasing power has risen. We would all be much poorer.

The costs and benefits of trade

This model explains many things. First, it sheds light on why such a big deal is made of electronics and why people buy so much. Yes, electronics can be entertaining, but they are also affordable to most people. Second, it shows why housing gave us a global crisis and is now looking to become an economic headwind again.

Third, and perhaps most important, it illustrates how the current trade situation developed and why. Companies didn’t outsource production to China out of hatred for the American worker but because they had to, in order to produce things the American consumer could afford. They succeeded, and it’s good they did, as you can see above. The ability and willingness to go outside the U.S. certainly had costs, but it also had real benefits.

Those benefits are easy to take for granted, which is what drives much of the current commentary about trade deficits and trade wars. The fundamental idea behind a trade war is that somehow the current situation happened because one country took advantage of another. That is not the case. For both countries, there is a mix of benefits and costs. Here in the U.S., the costs included lost jobs for everyone. But the benefits included cheaper goods and a more affordable standard of living for everyone.

Reduce costs, reduce benefits

We can certainly try to reduce the costs. But when we do so, we must keep in mind that we will likely be reducing the benefits as well. You might well say you are willing to pay more for a TV to bring good jobs back here. But are you willing to pay more for everything—including mortgage rates, housing, and so forth? And are you willing to have everyone else pay more, including those who can least afford to do so?

It’s never as simple as that. The chart above does an excellent job of showing why that is.

Subscribe via Email

Crash-Test Investing

Hot Topics

New Call-to-action



see all



The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.


Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®