The Independent Market Observer

Wage Growth: Real Vs. Imaginary

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA®, CFP®

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Jul 25, 2017 4:32:55 PM

and tagged Commentary

Leave a comment

wage growthToday I’m going to discuss one of the major concerns out there: wage growth. Specifically, is what we’re seeing in terms of wage growth real or imaginary?

Let’s start with the chart below, where you can see wage growth ran at about 2 percent per year from 2011 through 2015 and then started to grow, until recently. Looking at this chart, you could conclude that the recovery really began to help the average worker at the start of 2015—and that things might be starting to change.

wage growth

This chart is a bit misleading, though, in that it covers only the past 10 years. So, let’s look at a longer period in the next chart, extending back to the past 40 years. It presents a slightly different data set, including only production and nonsupervisory workers, which is probably a better proxy for the average person.

wage growth

According to this chart, wage growth is still pretty terrible. Although it has recovered a bit, it remains at the bottom of the range. Further, there’s no sign of growth moving back up to the 4-percent range of the past 30 years and no hope of achieving the 8-percent range of the late 1970s.

Again, however, this chart is misleading in that it is in nominal dollars and does not include the effects of inflation. Higher wages, if matched with higher prices, don’t really improve a worker’s standard of living. A better tool is to adjust the wage level for the effects of inflation to determine the real change in wages and, consequently, the real change in a worker’s purchasing power. This is illustrated in the chart below.

wage growth

By adjusting the average wage for inflation, we can see that real wages actually declined through the 1980s and early 1990s. They started to grow again in the late 1990s and continued, with pauses, in the mid-2000s and early 2010s, to the point where real wage purchasing power is just now approaching the level of 1980.

Looking at the annual percentage changes below, you can clearly see the negative trend through the 1980s, as inflation eroded purchasing power, as well as the gains in the 1990s and 2000 as inflation subsided. In this context, wage growth in recent years has actually been pretty good—approaching 2.5 percent—which is the highest we have seen over that time period. The recent pullback puts that into question, of course, but the recovery overall has not been that bad.

wage growth

In fact, if we take that chart and look at only the last 10 years, as shown below, we see that real wage growth was accelerating from after the 2011 Greek financial panic to until about 18 months ago. It then pulled back over the next 12 months but has since risen for about the past 6 months.

wage growth

What’s the takeaway?

The takeaway here is that, despite a very real pullback, we have seen substantial increases in purchasing power for the average worker since 2013. Moreover, that increase looks likely to continue based on the most recent data.

There are real concerns about the low level of price inflation, but one very positive effect is that even low nominal levels of wage growth are actually quite effective in raising workers’ purchasing power. Psychologically, low wage growth remains damaging, which probably explains some of the weak spending data. Functionally, however, conditions are better than they have been in years—and may continue to improve even more.

As always, adding some historical context and really thinking about what a data set means allow us to both understand and act more effectively than the headline data alone would do. Given this data, the long expansion of the economy—and rise in the stock market—makes a lot more sense.

  Subscribe to the Independent Market Observer

Subscribe via Email

New call-to-action
Crash-Test Investing

Hot Topics

New Call-to-action



see all



The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

The VIX (CBOE Volatility Index) measures the market’s expectation of 30-day volatility across a wide range of S&P 500 options.

The forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio divides the current share price of the index by its estimated future earnings.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.


Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®