The Independent Market Observer

Thinking Ahead: The Next Major War

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA®, CFP®

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Jul 17, 2015 2:11:00 PM

and tagged Commentary

Leave a comment

next major warFor some reason, when things are good—and they are—I start thinking about the next set of problems. Call it the Eeyore mindset, or just a deep need to try and see around the corner. This gets me into trouble sometimes, as I usually identify five out of every three problems that show up. But to the extent that it lets me think through issues before they become urgent, it’s usually a helpful tendency.

One potential issue on my radar lately is what the next major war might be. I’m not talking about conflicts such as the Russian invasion of Georgia or takeover of eastern Ukraine, or the skirmishing between India and Pakistan over Kashmir. I’m talking about an industrial-level conflict between major states, an even match between global players.

Although the Arctic and Africa also deserve attention, my two big areas of concern right now are Europe and Asia.

In Europe, echoes of World War I

The current Greek crisis has spawned multiple comparisons to 1914. Although I think that’s overstating the case, there are definite similarities between then and now, with each state focused on its own perceptions and needs while overlooking the bigger picture. Then, as now, both the Germans and the French acted on national interests and expectations, and the relationship deteriorated as those interests diverged.

Moreover, Russia is once again threatening Europe, with the smaller states, particularly Poland, caught in between. Increasingly, the U.S. is committing military resources to those front-line states, which says that risks are rising.

In Asia, escalating tensions at sea

For the first time since World War II, the Japanese government has voted to allow its military to operate as a military. For other Asian countries, this brings back bad memories. Japan’s decision was largely driven by continuing Chinese military expansion, especially in the South China Sea. China and Japan get much of their raw materials via sea and need to control their shipping lanes—but both can’t control them at the same time. Two recent headlines bring this point home:

The U.S. is already dialing up its response to Chinese claims in the area, and with the introduction of two more navies—well, what could possibly go wrong?

How long should investors count on peace?

The past 70 years have been, despite everything, among the most peaceful in human history, largely due to the overwhelming superiority of American power. The Pax Americana worked and, like any multigenerational state of affairs, is now taken for granted.

Bringing this back to the investing arena, think about how we normally analyze the world. You routinely see the word “postwar” on data sets. Most analyses implicitly assume that peace is now a given. And many analysts explicitly assume that, with the global economy as integrated as it is and most countries now organized around free markets and making money, a war would be irrational.

In an entirely rational world, of course, that conclusion makes sense. In fact, it has been reached before, several times. The most pertinent example was a book by a Briton named Normal Angell, called The Great Illusion, which argued that war between industrial countries made no sense. It was widely read and praised at the time of its publication—in 1909.

                      Subscribe to the Independent Market Observer            

Subscribe via Email

New call-to-action
Crash-Test Investing

Hot Topics

New Call-to-action



see all



The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

The VIX (CBOE Volatility Index) measures the market’s expectation of 30-day volatility across a wide range of S&P 500 options.

The forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio divides the current share price of the index by its estimated future earnings.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.


Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®