The Power of We

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA, CAIA, MAI

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Oct 22, 2019 3:36:47 PM

and tagged Commentary

Leave a comment

power of weWeWork has been one of the trending business topics in recent weeks. The collapse of its initial public offering, followed by the ouster of its CEO and founder, and now the drama over whether (and if) the company will be rescued have provided some compelling drama. It has played out more like a TV show than an actual company. Watch for the movie shortly, I expect.

I have been watching closely, because this kind of high-profile collapse typically precedes bigger problems. At some point in the cycle, the high expectations of growth and unlimited potential run smack into the real limitations of needing to make a profit. We have seen signs of this collision already in the performance of companies like Uber, where its life as a public company has been substantially more difficult than its life as a private one. But WeWork seems to be the peak of that particular cycle.

Lessons to be learned

There are a couple of lessons here. First, private markets are not always smarter than public ones. The argument for venture capital, or for private equity, has been that private investors can be smarter than public ones, able to create value and then sell it for a premium to the dumb money in the public markets. Up to a point, that argument holds. But clearly some private investors, who kept putting money in at increasingly inflated valuations, were counting on public investors to be their exit strategy. The “greater fool” theory holds there is always a bigger fool who will pay a higher price, and that seems to have been the logic here. The public markets, however, proved to be wiser than expected—and left the private money holding the bag. Maybe the discipline of public markets has something to recommend it after all.

This outcome is, obviously, bad for investors in private companies who want to exit, but it is a good sign for public markets. Real technology companies have been able to go public and do well. The public markets have been able to distinguish between those companies and hybrids, such as WeWork and Uber, that use technology but are not, fundamentally, tech companies. Uber is a cab company. WeWork is a shared office space company. Valuing them as what they really are is what the public markets are supposed to do, and they are working as intended.

A very good sign

One of the worries I started with is that this kind of event happens toward the end of the cycle, when things get crazy. What we are seeing, though, is that the crazy has been happening more in the private markets than in the public ones. The public ones, at least as far as these companies go, have been fairly rational. The private investors were apparently expecting the public markets to embrace the crazy, like 1999—but that has not happened.

Which is a good sign for the future. If the public markets are still being fairly rational, that means the end may be farther off—and less damaging—than people like me worry about.

If you look at the broader market, you see the same things. Based on current interest rates and recent history, market valuations are not cheap, but they are not crazy expensive either. Based on analyst expectations, earnings are expected to go down, not grow to the sky. That public market lack of crazy that is knocking down private deals may also be keeping the market out of the riskiest territory.

The real power of we

This situation shows the benefit of a real public market system, where many buyers and sellers are setting prices. The wisdom of crowds is certainly not infallible, but most of the time it works. Just as it seems to be doing now. With all of us trying to figure things out, we get closer than any of us—smart money or not—could do alone.

Forget about WeWork. This is the real power of we.

Subscribe via E-mail

New call-to-action
Crash-Test Investing
Commonwealth Independent Advisor

Hot Topics

Have a Question?

New Call-to-action

Conversations

Archives

see all

Subscribe

Disclosure

The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly into an index.

The MSCI EAFE Index (Europe, Australasia, Far East) is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.  

Third party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided at these websites. Information on such sites, including third party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.

Member FINRASIPC

Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®