Monthly Market Risk Update: June 2016

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA, CAIA, MAI

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Jun 8, 2016 3:07:20 PM

and tagged Commentary

Leave a comment

market risk updateThis will be the penultimate post in our series on how to spot pending bear markets.

Although expensive valuations are a noted risk factor in past bear markets, they don’t give us much to go on timing-wise, as markets can stay expensive (or get much more expensive) for years and years. We can, however, try to:

  • Recognize when risk levels are high
  • Determine when those high risk levels become an immediate, rather than theoretical, concern

That’s precisely what this monthly update on market risks is designed to do. Just as with the economy, there are several key factors that matter, both in determining the risk level and assessing the immediacy of that risk.

Risk factor #1: Valuation levels

When it comes to assessing valuations, I find longer-term metrics—particularly the cyclically adjusted Shiller P/E ratio, which looks at average earnings over the past 10 years—to be the most useful in determining overall risk.

market_risk__1.jpg

Two things stand out here:

  • First, valuations are approaching the levels of 2007–2008, which speaks for itself.
  • Second, even at the bottom of the recent pullback, valuations were still at levels above any point since before the financial crisis.

Although close to their highest levels over the past 10 years, valuations remain slightly below the 2000 peak, so you could argue that this metric isn’t suggesting immediate risk. Of course, that assumes we might head back to 2000 bubble conditions, which doesn’t exactly mean risks are low. 

Risk factor #2: Changes in valuation levels

As good as the Shiller P/E ratio is as a risk indicator, it’s a terrible timing indicator. One way to remedy that is to look at changes in valuation levels over time instead of absolute levels.

market_risk_2-1.jpg

Here, you can see that when valuations roll over, with the change dropping below zero over a 10-month or 200-day period, the market itself typically falls shortly thereafter. With the recent recovery, we have just about moved out of the trouble zone and continue to advance in the right direction. Although risks remain, they may not be immediate.

Risk factor #3: Margin debt

Another indicator of potential trouble is margin debt.

market_risk_3-3.jpg

Thanks to the market recovery and some de-risking by borrowers, debt levels (as a percentage of market capitalization) have moved down, although they still remain high. I think this continues to be an indicator of higher risk, but with recent improvements, not necessarily immediate risk.

Risk factor #4: Changes in margin debt

Consistent with this, if we look at the change in margin debt over time, spikes in debt levels typically precede a drawdown. Therefore, even as the absolute risk level remains high, the immediate risk does not.

market_risk_4-2.jpg

The spike in debt that led the most recent pullback is coming down, away from the risk zone. Though the absolute level of margin debt is high, and so is the risk level, the trigger seems to be getting farther away.

Risk factor #5: The Buffett indicator

Said to be favored by Warren Buffett, the final indicator is the ratio of the value of all the companies in the market to the national economy as a whole.

market_risk_5-2.jpg

On an absolute basis, the Buffett indicator is actually somewhat encouraging. Although it remains high, it has pulled back to less extreme levels. On a change-over-time basis, however, downturns in this indicator have typically led market pullbacks—and once again, we see that here. With the recent uptick, though, this indicator also suggests the risks are not immediate.

Stocks could push even higher

Technical metrics are reasonably encouraging as well, with the Dow, the S&P 500, and the Nasdaq all well above their 200-day trend lines. Even as markets approach new highs, it is quite possible that the advance will continue. Despite the high valuation risk level, a break into new territory might actually propel the market higher.

On balance, all of the metrics are in a high-risk zone, historically speaking, so we should be paying attention. But there’s a big difference between high risk and immediate risk—and it is one that's crucial to investing. None of the indicators suggests an immediate problem, and several suggest risk may be receding.

From a valuation perspective, then, a bear market does not seem to be pending at this time.

Tomorrow, we’ll wrap up this series with some thoughts on different types of bear markets, plus how you can incorporate this type of analysis into your own investing practice.  

  Subscribe to the Independent Market Observer -

Subscribe via E-mail

New call-to-action
Crash-Test Investing
Commonwealth Independent Advisor

Hot Topics

Have a Question?

New Call-to-action

Conversations

Archives

see all

Subscribe

Disclosure

The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly into an index.

The MSCI EAFE Index (Europe, Australasia, Far East) is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.  

Third party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided at these websites. Information on such sites, including third party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.

Member FINRASIPC

Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®