The Independent Market Observer

Looking at the Government Shutdown from an Economic Perspective

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA®, CFP®

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Jan 11, 2019 3:39:35 PM

and tagged Commentary

Leave a comment

government shutdownWe’ve been talking all week about the economy, the markets, and the risks therein. But looking back on these posts, there seems to be a glaring hole: the government shutdown.

That absence wasn’t an accident. In the longer term, which is how investors should look at things, the current government shutdown very likely won’t matter. As such, it hasn’t warranted a discussion. The shutdown will last until it’s over. Then, we will move on, just as we have done with past shutdowns.

A lingering situation

Today, though, the current shutdown ties for the longest ever with the 1995–1996 shutdown under Bill Clinton. Now, as then, the issue is a confrontation between a president and Congress of different parties. I won’t get into the politics of the situation, as we all have our own opinions. But from an economic perspective, the shutdown is starting to change from a blip to a potential problem, which will grow more serious over time.

Up until now, the effect has largely been on confidence. No one likes a shutdown, and the uncertainty can rattle markets. At the same time, we have seen this before—twice last year—so markets were taking it in stride. The presumption was that a deal would be cut, and life would go on.

That still remains the base case. But the fact that we will be in record territory come tomorrow and that negotiations seem to have stalled means we have to consider what would happen if the shutdown extends for a much longer period.

The direct costs

An Office of Management and Budget analysis of the 2013 shutdown (lasting 16 days) estimated an impact of 0.2 percent to 0.6 percent on GDP, which is significant, as well as the loss of about 120,000 private-sector jobs. We are now in the 21st day of the shutdown. So, a reduction in GDP of somewhere between 0.5 percent and 1 percent and about 200,000 jobs might be a reasonable estimate of the current damage, which will continue to accrue over time. For an economy growing at a rate of about 2 percent to 2.5 percent, that loss is material. The direct impact is real and growing. If it ends quickly, it will be a blip. But as it extends, the damage is really adding up.

The indirect costs

Those are just the direct costs. The indirect costs include loss of consumer and business confidence, which drives spending and investment; damage from lack of services (e.g., a TSA slowdown at airports); and lost transactions (e.g., failed student loans, farm loans, and others under federal programs). Again, these costs are manageable in the short term but will mount over time.

More trouble ahead?

Making the shutdown even more worrying is that once we get beyond it, we have another financial and political battle pending: the U.S. hits the debt ceiling likely sometime this summer. The last Congress agreed to suspend the debt ceiling, which took it off the table. But that suspension expires on March 2. At that point, the Treasury will have to resort to the “usual emergency measures” to keep the government operating while Congress negotiates to increase the debt ceiling. This shutdown may just set the stage for an even more damaging confrontation later this spring.

Not a big deal, yet

A short shutdown has become normal and, as such, is not worth commenting on too much. This shutdown, however, is moving into new territory. As the direct damage mounts and the indirect consequences pile up, we can expect the effect on the economy and markets to get potentially much worse, all while setting the stage for the debt ceiling battle.

Pay attention. This wasn’t a big deal, but it could become one quite quickly.

Subscribe via Email

Crash-Test Investing

Hot Topics

New Call-to-action



see all



The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

The VIX (CBOE Volatility Index) measures the market’s expectation of 30-day volatility across a wide range of S&P 500 options.

The forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio divides the current share price of the index by its estimated future earnings.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.


Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®