The Independent Market Observer

Is the July Jobs Report Really as Bad as It Looks?

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA, CAIA, MAI

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Aug 3, 2018 10:52:50 AM

and tagged Commentary

Leave a comment

jobs reportThe employment report, probably the single most important economic report there is, came out this morning, and the headline number on job creation was not good at all. In June, the economy added 213,000 jobs, and the expectations for July included another 193,000. Instead, we got only 157,000. You might see a fair amount of angst in the coverage today.

What the headline figure doesn’t show

I think it is fair to be concerned—this is a big miss. But when you look at the details, we’re still in pretty good shape jobs-wise. To start, even though we came in 36,000 jobs short of expectations, the June jobs report was revised up by 35,000—from the initial figure of 213,000 to 248,000—a revision that offsets almost the entire shortfall for July. Earlier months were also revised up by an additional 24,000 jobs, so on a net basis, we are actually ahead of expectations.

The supporting data tells much the same story:

  • Private payrolls came in 20,000 short, but June was revised up by 32,000, leaving us ahead on a net basis.
  • Average weekly hours worked were “down” to 34.5 in July, but that reflects an upward revision to 34.6 in June, so we’re actually steady at a very healthy level.
  • The unemployment rate ticked back down, to 3.9 percent from 4 percent, and the underemployment rate dropped from 7.8 percent in June to 7.5 percent in July—the lowest rate since 2001.

So, although the monthly add was disappointing, the labor market itself seems quite healthy.

A trend change?

That said, the fact that the labor market was running even hotter than we thought—enough to make up for this month’s shortfall—also means that the slowdown, if that is what it turns out to be, is even sharper. Could this be the start of a more extended drawdown? Reasons to believe it might be include the large contribution to job growth from manufacturing, which might be under threat from the tariff wars, as well as the growing shortage of workers.

Of course, it is far too early to say one way or the other. This kind of weak month is not out of the ordinary: We last saw one in March of this year. And in 2017, we had two months with job growth of just 14,000 and 73,000, only to see total job creation remain strong. One down month isn’t enough to signal a trend change, and the long-term job growth trend remains above where it was in 2017. More than that, after a strong run—and job growth this year has been very strong—a weak month or two is normal, even expected.

Another reason to think that worry is premature is the wage growth numbers, which pushed up from a downwardly revised 0.1 percent last month to 0.3 percent this month. Last month’s numbers were pulled down by the hiring surge, but the July figure rebounded in the face of slower hiring. On an annual basis, wage growth, at 2.7 percent, remains close to the highest level since the crisis, which would be unlikely if the labor market were weakening substantially.

Is the headline number disappointing? Yes. And it certainly raises the stakes for the next couple of reports. Nevertheless, the overall trend and underlying data are significantly more positive, and conditions remain healthy overall.

Subscribe via E-mail

New call-to-action
Crash-Test Investing
Commonwealth Independent Advisor

Hot Topics

New Call-to-action



see all



The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly into an index.

The MSCI EAFE Index (Europe, Australasia, Far East) is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.  

Third party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided at these websites. Information on such sites, including third party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.


Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®