The Independent Market Observer

Is Runaway Inflation an Inevitability?

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA, CAIA, MAI

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Apr 29, 2020 12:39:46 PM

and tagged Commentary

Leave a comment

inflationWith the Fed’s regular meeting concluding today, expectations are that the central bank will continue to provide whatever stimulus is necessary to keep the economy afloat. In conjunction with the federal government’s unprecedented multi-trillion dollar stimulus program, fears are rising that inflation is coming both fast and hard—and that we, as investors, need to plan now for this inevitability. I don’t believe it.

Runaway inflation?

First, runaway inflation has been inevitable, according to this logic, since at least 2009, when the great financial crisis unleashed the last round of significant stimulus. Hasn’t happened yet. Second, by the same logic, Japan has been in the grip of runaway inflation for the past three decades. Except it hasn’t. Third, Europe has had the same problem with inflation as Japan for the same policy-driven reasons. Yes, Europe has been like Japan, but not because either has runaway inflation.

What drives inflation is an excess of financial demand compared with the supply of goods. If the supply remains relatively constant (e.g., houses) and the financial demand goes up (e.g., more buyers or the same number of buyers who can pay more due to lower mortgage rates), then we see prices go up and call this inflation.

A drop in demand

With the coronavirus economic shutdown, we see fewer buyers for almost everything—less demand. We also see less financial ability to buy, as many workers have seen their incomes slashed. There has been a massive drop in demand due to the shutdown. Left to itself, this situation would lead to deflation—not inflation. In fact, deflation is exactly what the Fed and federal government are trying to avoid.

The lower rates and trillions of dollars of stimulus are not coming in on top of the regular level of demand. With job income and consumer spending vanishing, the stimulus is designed to replace that demand, not supplement it. Even if everything went perfectly—and we know everything is not going perfectly—the total stimulus would leave aggregate demand more or less level. We will see demand drop significantly. In fact, the economic growth report for the first quarter of 2020 showed the economy down by 4.8 percent at an annual rate. It will get significantly worse next quarter. With less demand and the same number of things available, there is no upward pressure on prices. This scenario is why I am not worried about inflation right now.

But what about the future?

Going back to what inflation really is, we could get inflation from one of two things. First, demand could recover significantly. Second, supply could go down by even more than demand. Either path could create higher inflation.

Demand recovery. Many of the fears around inflation center on a fast recovery in demand. The stock market, in particular, is betting that the coronavirus will be old news by the end of this year and that demand will recover quickly. If that plays out, then consumer demand will recover. And if the stimulus programs continue, then we will indeed have the kind of excess demand that would fuel inflation. Note the two assumptions, though. While demand might recover that quickly, it is not assured by any means. Second, if demand does recover that quickly, I suspect that the stimulus programs will be dialed back in proportion. To get significant inflation, we need both a rapid recovery and a continuation of the stimulus programs. If we get the first, I suspect we will not get the second.

Supply constraints. The second potential cause of higher inflation, supply constraints, is a more realistic threat. We have already seen, for example, parts of the supply chain for the meat industry start to seize up. Even here, while individual sectors of the economy might be affected, we don’t see a systemic problem with supply chains yet. Even if such problems do start to develop, the supply would have to decrease by more than the drop in demand to generate inflation. It could happen but is more likely a development over the next couple of quarters at the soonest. We would have time to see it coming.

Watch for the warning signs

And this is the final point: if conditions do line up to generate meaningful inflation (which is possible but not, at this point, likely), this alignment will become apparent well ahead of when it starts to affect portfolios. As investors, we always want to keep an eye on the future, and inflation is certainly one of the risks to watch for. Right now, though, the conditions simply are not in place. We will have plenty of warning before they are, and we will be able to address the problem when it shows up.

Remain calm and carry on.

Subscribe via E-mail

New call-to-action
Crash-Test Investing
Commonwealth Independent Advisor

Hot Topics

New Call-to-action



see all



The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly into an index.

The MSCI EAFE Index (Europe, Australasia, Far East) is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.  

Third party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided at these websites. Information on such sites, including third party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.


Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®