The Independent Market Observer

Investor Worries on the Rise—But Is It Time to Panic?

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA, CAIA, MAI

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Jan 20, 2023 12:55:00 PM

and tagged Commentary

Leave a comment

investor worriesI have gotten more than the usual number of worried emails, texts, and calls recently—not only from Commonwealth advisors, driven by the concerns of their clients, but from my clients as well. While I understand most of what’s behind those worries—the debt ceiling, at the moment—what is interesting is that last year, during the bear market, I heard much less in the way of worry. It’s not that people weren’t concerned, but there wasn’t the level of immediate fear that I am hearing right now.

The Fear Is Real

I suspect that was largely because people get that the stock market goes up and down, and a decline (even a big one) is definitely something to expect. Now, on the other hand, we have what looks like some big shocks pending, in the form of the debt ceiling confrontation and a recession, and this is something we don’t expect to happen. Bear markets occur every couple of years, but economic crises—per the headlines about those shocks—don’t happen that often. In fact, the last one was the Great Financial Crisis (GFC). I suspect that people are thinking of that, and even of the pandemic economic crisis, as a template for what might happen. That, of course, leads to real and justified fear.

Yesterday, I laid out the facts and circumstances around the debt ceiling confrontation. I won’t call it a crisis, because it isn’t. But I didn’t directly deal with the kind of fear about a systemic risk and collapse that is very prevalent right now. So, setting the specifics of current worries aside, let’s look at the stability of the system as a whole.

Shocks to the System

Let’s start by thinking about what it would take to really rock the system. We have only had two of those events in the past couple of decades: the GFC and the pandemic. What made those so bad?

First, they were unexpected. For the GFC, no one—and I mean no one—saw how the U.S. housing boom, combined with the interlocking nature of financial obligations, worked against what was in retrospect grossly insufficient capital, to basically shut down the global financial system. For the pandemic, again it was completely unexpected. Nothing like this had happened since 1918, and governments worldwide struggled to figure out what to do. The shutdowns basically shut down the economy as well: the same kind of unexpected shock that we saw in the GFC, with basically the same results.

Using these two events as a template, we can therefore come up with a preliminary definition of something that might take us into another systemic crisis. It would have to be unexpected. It would have to be global. And it would have to have the potential to shut down either the economy or the financial system. Absent all three of these factors, we would just have a fairly normal event. This gives us the context to look at the current set of worries.

Recession and the Debt Ceiling

Let’s start with a recession, which fails the first test. Any recession this year will be the most anticipated in history. The fact that we are even discussing it means the effects have largely already been discounted.

Second, let’s look at the debt ceiling. Here, we have some history. The first time it happened, markets were indeed rattled (and I wrote about it quite a bit). The second time, less so. And on to now, when markets are basically ignoring it. We know how it works, we know what to expect, and as I wrote yesterday, we now have the experience to largely look through even the worst case. Both of these are clearly worth watching, but they are not worth panicking about.

Beyond that, it is worth thinking more generally about systemic risks. Let’s assume something unexpected happens. By definition, we can’t predict it, but let’s assume. Next, we have to assume that whatever that is puts a significant strain on the financial system. What then?

A Robust System

In the GFC, what turned a housing crisis into a global banking system crisis was the lack of sufficient capital in the banking system. The good news now is that even if that were to happen again, the financial system is much better capitalized than it was during the GFC, largely due to reforms made to prevent a GFC recurrence. We know those reforms worked, too, as one of the key results of the pandemic was that the financial system was never under serious threat, despite the economic chaos. Even if we do get a shock—and what we are worrying about now won’t give us one—the system is much more robust. Beyond that, governments now have experience with two of those shocks and have learned valuable lessons.

So, it is certainly not time to panic. The things we are worrying about now are well known, are relatively small on a systemic level, and even if they occurred would not threaten either the economy or the financial system. They simply don’t fit the systemic crisis requirements. And even if and when something else comes up to combine with them to create a systemic crisis, we are in a much better place now than we were in either of the two previous crises.

Keep Calm and Carry On

In short, bad things can and will happen. But since our current worries are relatively known and contained, we will just move on through them—as we have always done.


Subscribe via Email

Commonwealth 2023 Economic and Market Outlook
Crash-Test Investing

Hot Topics



New Call-to-action

Conversations

Archives

see all

Subscribe


Disclosure

The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.

Member FINRASIPC

Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®