The Independent Market Observer

In the News: Carbon, Bank Fines, Deflation, Financial Conflict

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA®, CFP®

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Jun 4, 2014 2:18:00 PM

and tagged Commentary

Leave a comment

in the newsWith no major stories breaking today, let’s discuss a few key themes in the news lately.

On the horizon: carbon restrictions

The EPA’s proposed rule to cut carbon emissions from power plants is a big deal, but despite all the commentary, there really isn’t that much to say so far. The draft rule won’t be finalized for some time, probably next summer. Then, states have a year or so to figure out their own plans, which wouldn’t be finalized until 2017. This story ties in pretty well with my recent post about taxes—specifically, how the government is continuing to take an inch at a time, in a number of areas.

Big bank fines continue

The government is also leaning in when it comes to fining wrongdoers (or alleged wrongdoers). As multibillion-dollar fines of banks and financial institutions become relatively common, government regulators seem to have an old quote in mind: “Why do I rob banks? Because that’s where the money is!” While banks should certainly be punished for breaking the rules, the real victims here are the shareholders. Why not put executives in jail, rather than take money from shareholders? Wait—that wouldn’t generate any revenue. Never mind.

What’s so bad about deflation?

In an effort to avoid deflation, the European Central Bank is widely expected to launch some sort of quantitative easing stimulus program, like those of the Fed and the Japanese central bank. There are two reasons why deflation—that is, a sustained drop in pricesis bad:

  • First, while asset prices decline, debt remains the same, so deflation leads directly to loss of equity, making people poorer.
  • Second, when people expect prices to decline, they put off spending money, which slows the economy and potentially heightens the deflation problem.

The ECB action should weaken the euro, which will support the dollar’s value but also probably worsen the U.S. trade deficit and the competitive position of America’s exporters. Unintended consequences abound, not least of which is the threat of competitive devaluations, or currency wars, from other countries.

Financial and trade wars heat up

The U.S. has essentially been waging a financial war—and a very effective one—against Iran, and an article in today’s New York Times highlights how those weapons are being more widely applied. In an interconnected global economy, military force is not the only tool. Unfortunately, that can and will be a two-edged sword when applied against the U.S. Currency Wars, by James Rickards, is a good introduction to this topic.

Trade restrictions are another area of economic conflict. After decades of freer trade, protectionism in the form of tariffs and outright trade bans has become more common. For instance, the U.S. recently imposed severe tariffs on Chinese solar panel imports. Expect to see more of this, especially with the attempted devaluation of the yen and the euro. When currencies are cheap, goods sell for less. Imagine GM trying to compete with, say, a Toyota or a Mercedes that is 20 percent to 30 percent cheaper in dollar terms.

Remembering Tiananmen Square

Finally, today marks the 25th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square protests, when brave Chinese students tried to face down their government. They failed, but despite the Chinese government’s best efforts, they have not been forgotten. 

Subscribe via Email

Crash-Test Investing

Hot Topics

New Call-to-action



see all



The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

The VIX (CBOE Volatility Index) measures the market’s expectation of 30-day volatility across a wide range of S&P 500 options.

The forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio divides the current share price of the index by its estimated future earnings.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.


Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®