The Independent Market Observer

Another Look at the Long Run

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA, CAIA, MAI

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Feb 22, 2017 4:49:05 PM

and tagged Investing

Leave a comment

long runLast week, we started thinking about what the long run really means for investors. It was a decent first cut, but the graphs I used to illustrate my point were not as useful as I had hoped. Today we’ll take a more numerical look at the argument.

Several years ago, I wrote a paper that addressed a similar set of problems. It looked at returns over each decade from the 1970s through the 1990s, using both minimum and average returns, summarized as follows. (Note that this includes all 10-year periods, on a monthly basis, ending in the target decade.)

long run_1.jpg-1.png
As you can see, the returns varied dramatically by decade. Trying to estimate the next 10 years using the past 10 would have been very misleading. In the 1980s, you did very well no matter what. In the 1990s, you could actually lose money over a 10-year period if you were unlucky in your starting and ending points.

There were similar results for different holding periods, which suggests that the analysis in the last post is not the best way to look at the issue. In fact, it illustrates a question that strikes at the core of the problem: Why should we assume that returns over past time frames are valuable indicators of returns in the future? That assumption was baked into both the prior post and the charts above, but does it make any sense?

After all, as the standard investing disclaimer states, past performance is not indicative of future results, and we have seen this proven over and over. Think of the economy and the financial markets as growing, complex, adaptive systems—in a way, much like people. And just like a person, they can be in a good mood, get sick, throw tantrums, and so forth. Would you judge someone’s next 10 years based on the past decade? For most of an individual’s life, that would make very little sense.

If time isn't a good indicator, what is?

One possibility lies in the idea of mean reversion—in other words, that changes over various time periods tend to bounce around a central tendency. (We saw this in the charts in the last post.) Of course, this brings time back into the equation, insofar as shorter time periods tend to show more of a central tendency, as you can see on the graph. 

long term.jpg

The five-year line tends to bounce around a central number, returning to it whenever it gets too far afield. But this doesn’t actually tell us much about what the next period will look like. The other problem is that we haven’t identified the underlying factor that drives this mean reversion.

The search continues . . . .

Our challenge is to find some fundamental factor that explains future returns over a given time period. If we can identify a factor that is both empirically and theoretically consistent with those future returns, this could be a much better guide to the long run than trying to do a time-based analysis, which has no theoretical justification and, as we saw in the previous post, not all that much empirical success.

We’ll take a look at what kind of indicator that might be in the next post. Before we go there, though, it's interesting to note that we started looking at returns over time but have now moved on to something very different. Clearly, what investors need to be looking at is not always what we think we should be looking at.

  Subscribe to the Independent Market Observer

Subscribe via Email

Crash-Test Investing
New call-to-action

Hot Topics

New Call-to-action



see all



The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.


Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®