The Independent Market Observer

3 Big Themes that Won't End with the Election

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA®, CFP®

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Nov 2, 2016 3:10:14 PM

and tagged Politics and the Economy

Leave a comment

electionAfter months of election hype and angst, next week we should know who the next president and Congress will be. What then? 

Fundamental shifts look likely to continue

The election is playing out over three underlying transitions that were in place before it started and are likely to continue indefinitely:

  • Policy to fundamentals
  • Global to local
  • Capital to labor

These ongoing shifts help explain why this election has been so fraught and highlight what the next government will have to confront. Let’s take a brief look at each of them.

Policy to fundamentals. This shift is best expressed by the Federal Reserve’s struggle to begin raising interest rates. Since the crisis, the economy has been supported by monetary policy while the fundamentals healed. Now that fundamentals have largely recovered, the Fed needs to start shifting the burden back in that direction. The problem is that financial markets have become largely dependent on the Fed’s loose policy. The transition from a policy-driven market to a fundamentally driven one could rattle the real economy as well. The next government will have to grapple with that transition.

Global to local. Recent conflicts over immigration and trade highlight the shift from global to local. Both have brought substantial benefits to the U.S. economy; both have also imposed substantial costs. Around the world, those who believe they are paying these costs are rising up in protest. The new president will have to figure out a way to maintain as many of the benefits as possible while helping cover the costs. People want their cheap TVs and high wages. The next government will have to negotiate that trade-off.

Capital to labor. We’ve just come to the end of a more than 30-year trend in which the financial sector grew and capital markets came to dominate national economic life. Wages for most Americans dropped during that time, and corporate profit margins rose. That trend has now started to reverse, in an economic context, and has transformed into a political one. During the election, both Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders galvanized the large segment of the population that feels they’re not getting their fair share. The next government will have to decide who pays and who gets paid—and it may be different from what we’ve seen over the past couple of decades.

An ongoing (and potentially beneficial) debate 

Given these powerful undercurrents, it’s almost surprising the election hasn’t been worse. Change is always difficult, and we are facing reversals in trends that have dominated for years—or in the case of trade, immigration, and capital, for decades. Former winners are now losing and will fight to regain their status. Some of the past losers are starting to win and will fight to keep doing so.

Any way you slice it, a lot of people are looking for a fight, and this election reflects that.

There’s no sign it will stop after the election, either. If the election results in a divided government, which looks very likely, we can expect the political combat to intensify. If we get a unified government, all Republican or all Democrat, we can expect substantial policy moves, which would almost certainly be reversed when the other party comes into office. In short, the current turbulence won’t go away with the next government, no matter who gets elected.

Now for the good news: This is exactly the kind of public debate and action that’s required to catalyze needed change over the next few decades. As bad as it may feel, this sort of conflict is actually fairly normal in U.S. history. In many respects, the election is not the end; it’s just the beginning.

  Subscribe to the Independent Market Observer

Subscribe via Email

New call-to-action
Crash-Test Investing

Hot Topics

New Call-to-action



see all



The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

The VIX (CBOE Volatility Index) measures the market’s expectation of 30-day volatility across a wide range of S&P 500 options.

The forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio divides the current share price of the index by its estimated future earnings.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.


Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®