The Independent Market Observer

3/4/14 – Back to the U.S. Budget

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA®, CFP®

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Mar 4, 2014 9:47:51 AM

and tagged Commentary, Politics and the Economy

Leave a comment

The Ukraine crisis appears to be stalled for now, with Putin—having made his point and essentially occupied the Crimea—deciding to hold there, while the Europeans determine how to proceed. This is probably where we will be for some time, and the markets seem to concur, as they have bounced right back. Move along, nothing to see here.

I don’t necessarily think this story is over, but for the moment, let’s return to a longer-term issue that I discussed on Friday, the U.S. budget deficit. The Congressional Budget Office’s projections are below.


I noted last week that the total deficit was expected to decrease as a percentage of the economy, but drew a distinction between the primary deficit—before interest payments—and the total. That is what I want to dig into today.

Over the next 10 years, the primary deficit is expected to drop to below 1 percent of the economy, which should be below the growth rate—meaning that the debt would shrink as a proportion of the economy. The primary deficit problem, then, is largely solved, at least based on the CBO projections.

The issue is that the primary deficit problem isn’t the actual deficit problem. While the primary deficit stabilizes, the actual deficit increases as interest payments are expected to increase. The problem we face can therefore be better understood not as a spending problem, but as an interest rate and accrued debt problem.

Understanding where the problem actually lies does not solve it, but it does help us understand the likely evolution of policy. There are two possible ways to make the situation better without cutting spending: lower the debt or maintain interest rates at lower-than-projected levels.

Arguably, there is no way to actually lower the debt. I say arguably because I wrote a piece for the CFA Institute that talked, albeit in a tongue-in-cheek sort of way, about having the Fed do exactly that. It currently holds almost $2.3 trillion in Treasury debt, per the following chart, and forgiving that would go a long way toward lowering the outstanding debt.


Unfortunately, it wouldn’t actually improve the deficit problem, because the Fed currently sends the interest payments it gets right back to the Treasury, but it was a nice thought.

Which leaves us with interest rates. The government clearly has an incentive to keep rates as low as possible; the question is whether it has any ability to do so. History suggests that, in fact, it does. Between the Fed and the Treasury, rates remained low in the 1950s up to the mid-1960s, per the following chart. As the Fed has shown in recent years, it hasn’t lost its ability to muscle the markets into keeping interest rates low, and in the absence of rising inflation, which is where we are right now, we can reasonably expect that’s what will continue to happen.


The problem with this is the assumption that inflation remains under control. For other, non-deficit reasons, the Fed is actually trying to create inflation. At some point, it will succeed, and interest rates will go up. Solve one problem, create another.

Which brings us back to spending. The bottom line is that we continue to have a problem in the medium term, and we either have to somehow keep interest rates low or cut spending so we can spend more on interest payments. That is the real pending budget problem, and just because it won’t hit for another couple of years doesn’t mean we shouldn’t plan for it.

Subscribe via Email

New call-to-action
Crash-Test Investing

Hot Topics

New Call-to-action



see all



The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

The VIX (CBOE Volatility Index) measures the market’s expectation of 30-day volatility across a wide range of S&P 500 options.

The forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio divides the current share price of the index by its estimated future earnings.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.


Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®