The Independent Market Observer

9/24/12 – No News Is . . . Good News?

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA®, CFP®

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Sep 24, 2012 12:22:21 PM

and tagged Politics and the Economy, Yesterday's News

Leave a comment

Honestly, when the lead headline in the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) is about the costs of “free” checking, and it runs right above a story about the Emmys, you know it is a slow day. We have the usual follow-up stories: Greece will probably be back in the headlines soon in a big way, but for now, France is trying to buy it some more time; in China, Bo Xilai’s police chief was sentenced to 15 years, and Japan warned China on the island conflict. And, of course, we have U.S. politics.

The U.S. political stories are the most interesting, in that they don’t focus on the elections but rather on the underlying issues. The New York Times (NYT) has two articles, “Liking It or Not, States Prepare for Health Law” on the front page and “What Do Teachers Deserve? In Idaho, Referendum May Offer Answer” on page A14.

The first NYT article talks about how many Republican-run states are quietly planning, as required, for implementation of the health care law by designing insurance exchanges; it also discusses the political difficulties that have arisen because of the law. For example, some Republican lobbying and interest groups—insurers and health care providers—are for state preparation, and some—the Cato Institute and Americans for Prosperity—are very much against it. The argument for setting up the exchanges is that if the states do not set them up, the federal government will. The argument against state setup is that the insurance exchanges should be controlled by the federal government, as they will be anyway. Notably absent from the discussion is what voters think. One clear message from the article is that the fights will not be over until after the November election and probably not even then. Stay tuned.

The second NYT article ties in nicely with the just-settled Chicago teachers’ strike. Idaho and Chicago are very different places, but the article quotes the Republican Governor of Idaho as saying, “I could empathize with Rahm and what he was going through.” The Chicago strike and the Idaho referendum are textbook cases about how government will be wrestling with limited resources going forward and how public sector workers are probably going to be facing lower pay and benefits. With Democrat Rahm Emanuel on one side and Republican Idaho on the other, this is clearly a trend that will most likely continue no matter who wins in November.

Finally, the most interesting story of the day also comes from the NYT, “Discovery of Skeleton Puts Richard III in Battle Once Again” (p. A8). Dug up from what used to be a priory but is now a parking lot, the hunchback king is being brought back for physical, and who knows, maybe reputational, rehab. As a Shakespearian—I belong to a group that meets every month or so to eat and drink and read a play (although I have to admit we are much better at the eating and drinking part)—I hope that the real Richard turns out to be a better guy than he has seemed based on Tudor propaganda. He died with a battleax in the back of his head—kind of puts our politics in perspective.

Have a great day!

Subscribe via Email

Crash-Test Investing

Hot Topics

New Call-to-action



see all



The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.


Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®