The Independent Market Observer

Communications Breakdowns

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA®, CFP®

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Aug 3, 2012 12:30:31 PM

and tagged Yesterday's News

Leave a comment

The latest financial market glitch leads the papers today. The problems generated by Knight Capital with its new and undertested trading program rattled the markets, raised systemic questions, and may well have killed the company. The Financial Times (FT) focuses on the firm with “Software glitch leaves brokerage Knight nursing loss of $440M,” while the New York Times (NYT) takes two looks at the revealed risks with “Errant Trades Reveal a Risk Few Expected” on the front page and “An Automated Jolt for the Markets” on the front business page. The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) is relatively restrained, with the headline “Loss Sweeps Trading Firm” on the front page.

The consequences to the firm, in the end, will not matter to the markets. The consequences of the systemic risks that were revealed, however, are a lot more important. I have to say that this gets back to the issue I discussed in the “Taking a Ferrari into the Back Country” post regarding how we have optimized the system. Knight was clearly focusing on speed to deployment and optimizing for speed under competitive pressures, rather than optimizing for robustness. If every piece of the system is like this, small wonder it is fragile. Every event like this makes it more important to optimize for robustness—or at least introduce it into the discussion.

Speaking of fragility, the markets got hit hard by the clarification the president of the European Central Bank (ECB) made to his earlier comments that the ECB would do whatever it took to support the euro. Although it was generally interpreted to mean that the ECB would actually do whatever it took, what Draghi actually meant, after consulting with the Germans, was that the ECB would consider further action at the appropriate time—in other words, not now, but after the governments start spending their own money. This hit the markets and then the front pages—the FT has “Draghi kills hopes of instant ECB action,” the WSJ has “Europe’s Bank Rattles Investors,” and the NYT’s business section has “A Lofty Vow Falls Short, and Investors Show Dismay.” Investors took a look at the revised meaning of “whatever it takes” and decided they would take their money off the table.

On the good news side, the NYT and the WSJ, both on page B3, have stories about how U.S. retailers’ sales beat forecasts overall. Never count the American consumer totally out. I expect this trend to continue as real incomes continue to increase.

On the keep-an-eye-on-this front is the NYT story “Buried in Details, A Warning to Investors” on page B1, which talks about the conflicts of interest between the bank that created a financial product and the investors, and whether the conflicts were adequately disclosed. Like the story last month about whether J.P. Morgan was pushing its own products, this shows that conflicts and warnings are going to come more and more to the forefront of regulation and litigation. Better to have an independent advisor who doesn’t have any proprietary products and works only for you. Just saying.

Another keep-an-eye-on-this story is “Michigan City Outsources All Its Schools” on page A3 of the WSJ. I have made the point before that balances are changing in pretty much every political and economic area, but to see a city give up its school system to a for-profit firm is shocking proof of just how much the old certainties are fading. Another story that you can expect to see a lot more about.

One final note: John Keegan, one of the foremost military historians, died on Thursday. I have read many of his books, and he was truly an accomplished writer, analyst, and storyteller. His obituary ran on page A9 of the WSJ. If you have any interest in such matters, I recommend his work highly.

Have a great day!


Subscribe via Email

New call-to-action
Crash-Test Investing

Hot Topics

New Call-to-action



see all



The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

The VIX (CBOE Volatility Index) measures the market’s expectation of 30-day volatility across a wide range of S&P 500 options.

The forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio divides the current share price of the index by its estimated future earnings.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.


Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®