The Independent Market Observer

Taking a Ferrari into the Back Country

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA®, CFP®

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Jul 9, 2012 10:13:43 AM

and tagged Commentary

Leave a comment

A couple of days ago, I wrote about how financial factors and decision models are receding in importance compared with other, noneconomic factors. While there are examples around the world that illustrate the process, it still is not necessarily apparent, given the constant financial headlines, whether and why this should be the case. I think it is helpful to take a look at the same phenomenon from another angle to show why this change has to happen and why, in the end, it will be a good thing.

Decision models are like cars. They are designed to get you where you want to go in as pleasing a way as possible. Pleasing, of course, depends on who you are and what you are trying to do. Large SUVs, for example, are optimized for size and carrying capacity, with a helping of off-road capability as well. But they are not optimized for either speed or fuel economy.

On the other end of the spectrum are the new Smart cars. I haven’t seen many in the wild yet, but the fact that they are optimized for fuel efficiency must offset the fact that they appear to be deathtraps in the event of a collision. The buyers know this—I saw one with a license plate that actually said “DETHTRP.”

On the other other end of the spectrum, you have the sports cars. They are optimized for speed, and on an open highway are the best at what they do, but off-road or at $4 a gallon, they do have drawbacks.

Over the past 20 years or so, our decision processes have been optimized for speed in the form of growth. Deregulation, growth of financial institutions and assets, and a focus on the service sector of the economy allowed growth to go at a higher speed. When the road is smooth and in good repair, and gas is affordable, that makes a lot of sense. With a smooth economic environment over that time period, the chance of an accident was low, and our Ferrari went pretty well.

Until the crash. We found out in 2008 that the road was less smooth and, therefore, the natural speed limit was perhaps lower than we had thought. As the road has turned rockier, our Ferrari has been less fun to drive, with its finely tuned suspension bouncing around and occasionally bottoming out. On these roads, maybe a Jeep makes more sense after all.

The road does not look to be getting smoother any time soon, and adapting to the rockier roads ahead essentially means trading some of the optimizations that gave us speed—less regulation, lower capital levels, less transparency—for optimizations that encourage robustness. Yes, we will go slower, and the journey will still be bumpy. But, as we continue to change our decision processes to emphasize nonfinancial factors more, hopefully, we will actually complete our journey in the Jeep and not break down by the side of a dirt road in a Ferrari.

Subscribe via Email

Crash-Test Investing

Hot Topics

New Call-to-action



see all



The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

The VIX (CBOE Volatility Index) measures the market’s expectation of 30-day volatility across a wide range of S&P 500 options.

The forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio divides the current share price of the index by its estimated future earnings.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.


Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®