The Independent Market Observer

Why Did My Investments Do Badly in 2014?

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA®, CFP®

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Jan 22, 2015 2:25:00 PM

and tagged Investing

Leave a comment

why did my investments do badlyI’ve had a lot of conversations recently about 2014 portfolio performance. Investors are reviewing their results, comparing them with the performance of U.S. stocks, and asking the question in the headline: Why did my investments do badly last year?

It’s a reasonable question, but let's keep things in perspective: Any year you make money—as most investors did—isn’t actually a bad year. You might want a better year, to be sure, but 2014 wasn’t bad for most. 2008 was a bad year.

Still, last year felt bad in light of what investors had expected. With the U.S. market up and the economy recovering, we expected a strong showing from our investments.

It all comes down to diversification

To understand why our investments may have disappointed, we have to dive into how investment portfolios are built. The core idea here is diversification—not putting all your eggs in one basket. This strategy helps you avoid getting caught in a particularly bad area, but it may also limit your exposure to particularly good areas.

Most years, this works well. Looking at the chart below, you can see that, from year to year, the best-performing asset classes vary significantly, and the performance of individual ones bounces around quite a bit.

Performance of Major Indices, 2005–2014
Source: Morningstar® Direct

Emerging markets, for example, went from best to worst from 2007 to 2008, and back to best in 2009. Given this volatility, and the impossibility of picking the best performer ahead of time, it makes sense to spread out your bets in the expectation that you’ll benefit from the best and get hurt less by the worst.

The underlying assumption here, though, is that most asset classes will perform well and several will perform similarly. By and large, this has been the case. In all but two of the past eleven years—2008 and 2011 being the exceptions—several asset classes have generated double-digit returns, and relatively few asset classes actually lost money. A diversified portfolio would have done well with that many gainers and few losers.

But, in a year when things go well in only one area and others don’t fare so well, you will have less exposure to the good area and substantial exposure to the bad—and underperform overall, especially with respect to the area of strength.

An outlier year for U.S. stocks

With this understanding, we can start to see why 2014 was so disappointing. Only two asset classes, both U.S. stocks, did well. What’s more, we saw losses in several asset classes, which pulled down relatively low returns even more. The less exposure you had to U.S. stocks, the worse you did.

A solution to this, of course, would have been to overweight U.S. stocks, but looking at recent history, this is a bad bet most of the time. Per the chart above, the S&P 500 has only been the top performer in one year: 2014. It’s been outperformed by emerging markets in six of the past ten years, by developed international markets in five of the past ten, and even by U.S. small-cap stocks in six of the past ten.

Over time, investing more in large U.S. companies has not been the best strategy, even though it did outperform in 2014.

The bottom line: diversification works most of the time

2014 was an exceptional year in many ways. Stocks of large U.S. companies were the only ones that did well, and most other investments did not do less well; they did poorly. Any diversified portfolio would underperform in that situation, even as it would have potentially outperformed in a more typical year.

In the end, though it’s easy to be disappointed by 2014 performance, it is just one of the inevitable outliers resulting from a diversified strategy. Over time, a diversified approach should offer both superior performance and reduced risk compared with a more focused strategy.


Subscribe via Email

New call-to-action
Crash-Test Investing

Hot Topics

New Call-to-action



see all



The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

The VIX (CBOE Volatility Index) measures the market’s expectation of 30-day volatility across a wide range of S&P 500 options.

The forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio divides the current share price of the index by its estimated future earnings.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.


Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®