What I Learned from the Presidential Debate

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA, CAIA, MAI

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Sep 27, 2016 4:54:36 PM

and tagged In the News

Leave a comment

presidential debateAs expected, last night’s presidential debate was a slugfest. With both Trump and Clinton swinging freely at each other, and the moderator struggling to maintain control, it was interesting to see how the candidates chose to spend their time in front of the nation. We learned something, even if it wasn’t what we might have wanted to learn.

Here’s what I took away from the debate:

  1. No free traders here. The first part of the debate was in many ways Trump’s strongest, as he laid into Mrs. Clinton for her support of free trade, notably NAFTA and the TTIP deal. She punted on both, leaving the presidential stage with no one willing to defend free trade. Protectionism has been on the rise in recent years, but the U.S. has done its best to keep markets open. Expect that to change over the next administration, regardless of who gets elected.
  2. Neither candidate could knock the other out. Both candidates did some damage—Trump on trade and e-mails, Clinton on tax returns and racism. In terms of their major goals, Trump stuck to his talking points of economic and global decay, while Clinton hammered home her policy goals to appeal to both her core voters and address areas where she may be weak. You could spin either one as the winner (and people are).
  3. Fact-checking is now in vogue. Although the moderator occasionally called the candidates out on the facts, multiple websites were vetting their statements in real time. The era of post-truth politics may not be here quite yet, at least in the media. Expect more focus on the candidates’ claims for the rest of the campaign.
  4. Markets reacted positively. This has been interpreted as a signal that Clinton won, which seems reasonable, particularly given the rise in the Mexican peso. But, just as with Brexit, the money markets may be a poor guide to what actual voters are thinking. How many currency traders vote in Ohio?

The most important takeaway, however, is what did not happen: a detailed discussion of policy. Among the topics that got only passing mention, or none at all, were Syria, Afghanistan, immigration, the deficit, and entitlement programs. On almost all of the serious issues the country faces, there was little or no commentary from the candidates.

What you see is likely what you'll get

On the whole, the consensus seems to be that Clinton won on points. I would break that down a bit: Trump did best in the first half hour, with the advantage shifting toward Clinton for the rest of the night. Market reaction seems to bear that out, with the caveat noted above. The real surprise, to me at least, was how little we actually learned about either candidate. Both did more or less what was expected. Both acted as they have in the past. 

And that may be the final takeaway: that what we’ve seen so far in the campaign really is what we get. From an economic perspective, there are two major differences between the candidates—namely, trade and taxes. Clinton may not be defending free trade, but neither is she likely to tear up existing agreements. Trump says he will, and I believe him. Clinton says she will raise taxes, while Trump says he will cut them. I believe both of them.

Both candidates have their flaws, but as we saw last night, they are what they are, and it seems we can take them at their word. After the debate, it's clear that we should vote based on whether we agree with what the candidates say they will do, not on the hope they will do something different.

Subscribe via E-mail

New call-to-action
Crash-Test Investing
Commonwealth Independent Advisor

Hot Topics

Have a Question?

New Call-to-action

Conversations

Archives

see all

Subscribe

Disclosure

The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly into an index.

The MSCI EAFE Index (Europe, Australasia, Far East) is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.  

Third party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided at these websites. Information on such sites, including third party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.

Member FINRASIPC

Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®