The Independent Market Observer

What Does the Alabama Election Mean for the Markets?

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA®, CFP®

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Dec 13, 2017 2:50:32 PM

and tagged Politics and the Economy

Leave a comment

Alabama electionYesterday’s news that the Democrats won the Alabama special Senate election, for the first time in 25 years, rattled U.S. politics. By taking the Republican majority in the Senate from 52 to 51, it reduces an already tight margin for difficult votes. By signaling that even the reddest states are now potentially in play for the Democrats, it could be a bellwether for the 2018 midterms. But what does the Alabama election mean for the markets?

The short term

In the short term, probably not much. With the race up in the air, a Republican defeat was a bit of a surprise—but not a shock. Markets reacted with aplomb after a quick tremor. This is no big deal. Republicans in Congress will certainly attempt to clear the tax reform bill before the new Alabama senator is seated, so this will have no impact on that. In fact, it might actually help passage of the tax bill, as potential holdouts are faced with a drop-dead date for their votes. “Now or never” becomes a much more credible negotiating point. With passage already largely expected by the markets, the impact should be small. If the bill fails, it will not be because of the election.

Medium and long term

Even in the medium and long term, it is probably not that big a deal either. In the medium term (defined here as until the 2018 midterm elections), Republican legislators will face essentially the same challenges they do now, albeit made a bit harder. From a legislative point of view, the landscape doesn’t change much, if at all. That doesn’t really matter, however. Up to this point, much of the positive economic policy changes have come from deregulation, rather than legislation. That will continue regardless of the Alabama election. Overall, there is little reason to expect much of an impact on markets or the economy due to a slightly reduced Republican majority.

In the long term (after the 2018 midterm elections), the impact is likely to be small. While the Alabama results suggest that the Democrats will do well, we have to consider the multiple special factors at work in this election. So far, the weight of the evidence suggests Democrats will indeed do very well in the midterms, which is consistent with historical results. But unless control of Congress changes, they will have no more power than they do now.

What if Democrats were to take control of either or both the House and Senate? From an economic and market point of view, nothing much is likely to change. Divided government yields gridlock, which is pretty much what we have had this year. In other words, the policy outcomes will be very similar to what we have seen so far, with little legislation (unless tax reform passes) and continued deregulation.

Same old, same old

The election results were a big deal in the political world. But the economy and markets should greet them with a yawn—and that seems to be exactly what is happening. We have a government narrowly controlled by the Republican Party, just as we did yesterday. We have the prospect for continued confrontation and legislative trench warfare—ditto. Finally, we have the prospect of more of that (whoever wins) after the midterms. In other words? Same old, same old.

Subscribe via Email

New call-to-action
Crash-Test Investing

Hot Topics

New Call-to-action



see all



The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

The VIX (CBOE Volatility Index) measures the market’s expectation of 30-day volatility across a wide range of S&P 500 options.

The forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio divides the current share price of the index by its estimated future earnings.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.


Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®