The Independent Market Observer

The Truth Behind the 7-Year Market Cycle

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA®, CFP®

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Jul 2, 2015 2:30:00 PM

and tagged Investing

Leave a comment

7-year market cycleOne of the things I’ve been meaning to do this summer is take an analytical look at the Shemitah, a quasi-biblical prophecy that predicts a crisis every seven years—which means the U.S. is due for “financial ruin” this year.

As regular readers know, I don’t have a lot of patience for unfounded calls for disaster (although I’m completely on board with well-founded calls for the same). What lends this story some plausibility is that the Shemitah folks can actually point to a seven-year cycle in U.S. financial markets over the past couple of decades. Not that I really believe God is smacking us every seven years, but there does appear to be something to the theory.

The underlying pattern revealed

As often happens, if you wait long enough, someone else does the work for you. In this case, it’s a report from Nationwide Insurance, which shows the same seven-year market cycle overlaid on a reasonable explanatory variable: an increase in interest rates by the Federal Reserve.

7-year market cycleSource: Federal Reserve Board of Governors

Rising rates make sense as a potential trigger for financial turbulence, and if you look at this chart closely, it may well indicate future trouble, though probably not this year. Historically, the fed funds rate needs to increase by more than 1 percent before we see a serious reaction.

So, where are rates headed?

Right now, the Fed is still debating whether (not when) to make the first rate hike, and September looks like the very earliest possibility. We likely won’t see a large increase in rates this year, and we may not see any increase at all. If it doesn’t happen this year, well, there goes the seven-year cycle.

Bigger picture, when the Fed increases short-term rates, longer-term rates usually follow. This time may be different, at least for a while, as both the European and Japanese central banks continue to buy bonds to keep rates low. The effects of this are flowing into the U.S. and keeping rates here low as well, which should continue. The seven-year cycle may end up stretching to eight or even nine years.

The trouble with magical thinking

As you can see, examining the underlying causes of a pattern may be a better way to evaluate the future than simply looking at history and extrapolating out from there. I find that many of the more extreme views, positive and negative alike, have this flaw. Magical thinking suggests that recent experience is the best indicator of the future—and therefore everyone continues to buy or sell. This is how both bubbles and crashes come about.

I’m not saying we don’t have challenges and concerns, or that we won’t see a pullback this year. We might. But the underlying facts remain supportive, and the time to look for serious trouble is when those facts start to decay.

This morning’s jobs data suggests such decay isn’t imminent. Job growth continued at strong levels in June but wasn’t fast enough to panic the Fed. The market is acting rationally in response to news such as the Greek crisis. Even as the Fed debates rate increases, monetary policy remains very stimulative.

We will certainly face trouble in the future. When we do, though, it won’t be because of magical cycles or Mayan apocalypses. Our troubles will be of our own making, which means they’ll also be solvable by us.

                      Subscribe to the Independent Market Observer            

Subscribe via Email

New call-to-action
Crash-Test Investing

Hot Topics

New Call-to-action



see all



The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

The VIX (CBOE Volatility Index) measures the market’s expectation of 30-day volatility across a wide range of S&P 500 options.

The forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio divides the current share price of the index by its estimated future earnings.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.


Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®