The Independent Market Observer

The Shifting Sands of the Market: A Challenge for Asset Allocators

Posted by Chris Fasciano

This entry was posted on May 16, 2024 11:26:41 AM

and tagged Commentary

Leave a comment

asset allocationIn our team meetings, we often discuss the shifting sands of the market. Not only is it an interesting topic, but it poses a challenge for asset allocators. We are in the midst of a multi-year outperformance cycle for large-cap growth. The companies that have driven this outperformance have all become household names: Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, Netflix, Nvidia, and Tesla. The top 10 names in the S&P 500 account for roughly 32 percent of the index compared to the average since 1990 of 20 percent. During the dot-com boom, the top 10 weightings peaked at 25 percent.

But the S&P 500 is not a representation of the entire market. The Russell 3000 is a broad measure of the U.S. equity market. This index provides diversified exposure through 3,000 stocks, including large-, mid-, and small-capitalization companies. So, what has the rally in large-cap growth meant for the broad market?

As seen in the chart below, it has meant quite a bit.

Russell 3000 Growth Index

 

Over the past 10 years, the weighting of the top 3 percent of companies known as the mega-cap part of the broad market has increased from 47 percent to 69 percent. The obvious offset to this is the contraction of the small- and mid-cap part of the market. Mid-cap has declined from more than one-third of the market to just under one-quarter, while small-cap has dropped from 15 percent to only 7 percent. That is a lot of shifting of the sands underneath the surface of the market! 

The Effects on Portfolio Construction

So, how do those who construct portfolios think about those shifting sands? Here at Commonwealth, we are proponents of rebalancing as part of any investment philosophy and process. In and of itself, it is a good risk management tool. As Bernard Baruch said, “No one ever went broke taking profits.” But if rebalancing back to target allocations is all one does without considering the changes in the market, it may lead to unintended risk at the portfolio level.

For example, if 10 years ago you allocated 50 percent to mega-cap and 15 percent to small-cap, you would have had a balanced and diversified portfolio that would mirror the returns and risk of the market. If all you did was rebalance your portfolio every year back to target weightings, today you would have a portfolio that is double-weighted to small-cap, overweight mid-cap, and underweight large-cap. That is a risk too big to ignore. 

The Fundamentals of Large- and Small-Cap

We also believe that the best investments over the long term have both attractive valuations and strong business fundamentals. Having tilts in the directions of asset classes is not only appropriate but also an important part of constructing client portfolios to add value. But what do the fundamentals of large- and small-cap tell us?

The prospects for AI have been the latest driver of large-cap growth’s outperformance. The large, well-known companies previously mentioned have the advantage of proprietary data and the benefits of consolidation and first-to-market. Unlike new technologies of the past, AI has been a winner-take-all end market to date. The secular growth opportunity for this part of the market is certainly exciting.

In general, small-cap companies have seen a shift in their fundamental outlook. Some of this shift has to do with the changing interest rate environment. Forty-five percent (excluding financials) of small-cap index debt is floating-rate debt. For the 10 to 15 years that interest rates were low, this was not particularly impactful. But as that debt is refinanced at higher rates, it affects companies’ ability to grow as more of their liquidity is needed to service the debt.

At the same time, roughly 40 percent of small-cap companies are unprofitable compared with just 7 percent of large-cap companies at the end of the first quarter of 2024 (per J.P. Morgan Asset Management). While it is certainly expected that some companies in certain businesses such as biotech will be unprofitable, this disparity does get to the difference in quality between the two asset classes. This could be because private companies are staying private for longer due to an abundance of private capital available. Therefore, by the time they come public, they are mid-cap if not large-cap companies. The natural replenishing of the small-cap opportunity set has slowed. 

Rightsize to Avoid Risk

We believe that diversification is still the best approach to constructing portfolios from both a value creation and risk management standpoint. There is a place in portfolios for large-, mid-, and small-cap asset classes. But they need to be rightsized for the current opportunity set. This will help avoid unintended risks in portfolios.


Subscribe via Email

Crash-Test Investing

Hot Topics



New Call-to-action

Conversations

Archives

see all

Subscribe


Disclosure

The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

The VIX (CBOE Volatility Index) measures the market’s expectation of 30-day volatility across a wide range of S&P 500 options.

The forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio divides the current share price of the index by its estimated future earnings.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.

Member FINRASIPC

Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®