The Independent Market Observer

The Growth Vs. Value Disparity

Posted by Peter Roberto

This entry was posted on Aug 19, 2020 2:54:39 PM

and tagged Commentary

Leave a comment

growthBrad here. Today's post on the growing disparity we're seeing between growth and value stocks is brought to you by Peter Roberto, an investment research analyst on Commonwealth’s Investment Management and Research team. Take it away, Peter.

Since the end of the first quarter of 2017, we’ve seen growth stocks, which can increase their revenue and earnings at a faster rate than their competitors, outperform value stocks, which have solid fundamentals but are priced below their peers. This shift has only gained momentum since the stock market lows of March 2020. Here, we’ll take a look at how this current run stacks up to two of the more famous growth periods: the dot-com era and the “Nifty Fifty.”

Where we are today

Let’s start by looking at where we are now, using the Russell 1000 Growth and Russell 1000 Value indices as proxies to illustrate the diversion in growth and value over the current run.

In the top panel of the first chart below, you’ll see the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth and Russell 1000 Value indices (in percentages) from March 31, 2017, through August 17, 2020. The bottom panel shows the spread between the two over the same time frame, topping out at 84.1 percent over 40.5 months.

Source: Bloomberg

In the next chart, we see the spread between the same two indices from June 1998 to March 2000. The spread topped out at 68.8 percent over the course of just 22 months.

Source: Bloomberg

Taking a look back

The current spread appears to be larger in magnitude than that of the dot-com era, but the pace at which it has occurred is nearly double the time frame. We should also highlight the notable expansion in the spread following the market bottom in March 2020, with spreads between growth and value widening 24.53 percent between March and June/early July.

Unfortunately, the Russell 1000 indices do not go back to the 1950s, 1960s, and early 1970s when the Nifty Fifty was at its peak. (Nifty Fifty is a term coined to refer to a group of 50 large-cap stocks that were considered appropriate for a buy-and-hold strategy. No matter the price you paid, the argument went, the stability and growth of these companies would make them good investments.) That said, we do have evidence of the premium these stocks demanded over their peers, as this quote from a 1977 Forbes magazine article reveals: 

What held the Nifty Fifty up? The same thing that held up tulip-bulb prices in long-ago Holland—popular delusions and madness of crowds. The delusion was that these companies were so good it didn’t matter what you paid for them; their inexorable growth would bail you out.

This situation led to an average price-to-earnings valuation multiple for these 50 stocks to a level 2.2x that of the S&P 500 Index. These names were also particularly concentrated, so much so that the top 10 stocks were more than 50 percent of the S&P 500 and the top 4 stocks represented 18 percent of the index.

Breaking down the numbers

So, how do the premiums and concentrations of today stack up to those of the Nifty Fifty and dot-com eras? Today, 45 companies make up 50 percent of the S&P 500 versus 33 companies during the peak of the dot-com era in 1999. Today, the Russell 1000 Growth Index trades at 40x earnings, roughly 1.7x that of the S&P 500. During the dot-com era, it traded as high as 60x earnings, representing 2x that of the S&P at the time.

If we look at other indices such as the Nasdaq 100, we do see indices of higher concentration, with the top 10 companies representing more than 50 percent of the index. In fact, in 2000, the five biggest companies composed 14 percent of the S&P 500 but contributed only 2 percent of the overall cash flow. Today, five stocks represent roughly 20 percent of index—but contribute a proportional amount of cash flow.

What can we expect going forward?

There are two things we can say for certain: the S&P 500 will continue to change, and growth will not outperform value in any given period. In fact, a 2018 study from Innosight found that the average tenure of companies in the S&P 500 dropped from 33 years in 1964 to 24 years in 2016. Further, over longer periods following the dot-com era, we have seen value outperform growth.

Given all of this, it’s important to know what you own and evaluate whether there may be unintended concentrations within your portfolios.

The Russell 1000 Growth Index is a market-capitalization weighted index of those firms in the Russell 1000 with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.

The Russell 1000 Value Index is a market-capitalization weighted index of those firms in the Russell 1000 with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.

Subscribe via Email

Crash-Test Investing
New call-to-action

Hot Topics

New Call-to-action



see all



The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.


Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®