The Independent Market Observer

The Fed: Much Ado About (Pretty Much) Nothing

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA®, CFP®

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Aug 20, 2015 3:35:00 PM

and tagged In the News

Leave a comment

the FedWill the Fed start to raise rates in September?

Economists and market watchers have been debating that question for months, concluding that September was a pretty safe bet. That got boring, though, so we took a couple of opportunities—the weak inflation report this week, the Chinese yuan devaluation, yesterday’s release of the July Fed minutes—to reopen the debate.

Now, the consensus seems to be that there’s less than a 50-percent chance of a September rate increase.

Basically, it all boils down to one question: how close is the economy to normal? By its charter, the Fed evaluates that through two lenses—employment and inflation. This dual mandate, as it’s called, guides both the Fed’s decision process and the analysis of people like me who try to second-guess it.

Employment looks good, but inflation too low

Historically, the Fed has defined normal as unemployment in the low 5-percent range and inflation of around 2 percent. When the economy deviates from those levels, the Fed’s policy is supposed to guide it back.

Per the Fed’s recent statements, employment is now closing in on normal. If we’re not there yet, we should be soon. The problem is inflation, which continues to be too low. The Fed’s decision to raise rates or wait depends on what inflation does in the next couple of months.

There are two flavors of low inflation:

  • Low inflation is bad when it results from a lack of demand.
  • Low inflation is good when it's due to technological progress that drives prices lower, even when demand is strong.

Right now, with employment growing steadily, the housing market normalizing, and consumer spending chugging along, there is no shortage of demand. Lower inflation is being driven by technological advances that have pushed the costs of energy, in particular, down sharply. Rather than harming the economy, this frees up cash for consumers to spend on other things, which can boost growth.

The Fed may wait on raising rates while one of its mandates is normal and the other is below normal—but for good reasons, not bad. Rates matter, but the change of a quarter percentage point, with the fundamentals strong, isn’t a big deal. Whether the first rate increase comes in September, December, or early next year, it simply won’t change how the economy evolves over the next several months.

Why I’m still betting on September

Personally, I believe the Fed remains likely to start raising rates in September, for a few reasons:

  • In many respects, the economy has normalized, and postponing a rate increase would call that into question.
  • There’s a real need to start reloading for when the economy does weaken again.
  • The longer the Fed waits, the faster—and more damaging—subsequent rate rises will be.

I won’t be shocked if it does wait, though. With China weakening, a currency war brewing in emerging markets, and Europe still not out of the woods entirely, you could make a case for continued low rates. Based on a mix of economic and political considerations outside the U.S., a delay would be defensible, but considering there will always be some level of concern, it would also be a mistake.

That said, from a U.S. perspective, the economic recovery continues, and the ultimate timing of a rate increase simply doesn’t matter all that much.

                      Subscribe to the Independent Market Observer            

Subscribe via Email

Crash-Test Investing

Hot Topics



New Call-to-action

Conversations

Archives

see all

Subscribe


Disclosure

The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

The VIX (CBOE Volatility Index) measures the market’s expectation of 30-day volatility across a wide range of S&P 500 options.

The forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio divides the current share price of the index by its estimated future earnings.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.

Member FINRASIPC

Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®