The Independent Market Observer

Is the Price Drop in Oil All Good?

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA®, CFP®

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Dec 9, 2014 2:02:00 PM

and tagged In the News

Leave a comment

MarketOutlook_1The short answer to that question is no. There is some downside to falling oil prices. But I’d take a 90-percent upside with a 10-percent downside any day of the week.

Much of the commentary on the price drop in oil, including mine, has focused on the benefits to consumers in the form of lower gas prices, which creates income that can be spent on other things, to the economy’s advantage. Recently, though, the narrative has turned to the costs of lower prices, such as lower capital investment, lower profits in the energy industry, and the potential for job losses.

All of these threats are real and worth paying attention to. In the big picture, though, they don’t even come close to offsetting the benefits of lower oil prices.

The potential effect on jobs

First, let’s look at job growth in the oil and gas sector over the past 10 years.

price_drop_in_oil

Note that this is the actual number of jobs, and it probably overstates the total slightly since I included all mining support jobs, not just those associated with oil and gas. Since 2010, about 300,000 jobs have been created, at best, which is not too shabby. We would be in much worse shape without those jobs, no doubt about it, especially since many of them came in the early years of the recovery.

Over the same time period, however, the economy as a whole created about 10 million jobs, so the 300,000 jobs in oil and gas represent only about 3 percent of the total. This is an important contribution, but a decline in the job growth rate for that sector would not be catastrophic.

The potential effect on economic growth

Similarly, the damage to companies investing in drilling, while potentially real and material, wouldn’t be a disaster.

Industrial equipment investment as a whole has contributed, historically, between 0.2 percent and 0.4 percent to economic growth. If we average that, at around 0.2 percent, and allocate half (which seems high) to oil and gas drilling, we get around a 0.1-percent potential hit to economic growth. If we include other, ancillary investment, we can double that, for a potential hit of around 0.2 percent. With growth running between 2 percent and 4 percent, that’s worth paying attention to but not losing sleep over.

Potential benefits far outweigh costs

So, the damage could be around 1 percent or 2 percent of employment growth and around 0.1 percent of economic growth. The upside, in the form of lower costs for consumers and businesses, could be immense.

One common rule of thumb, per the Wall Street Journal, is that a $5 change in the price of oil results in a 0.1-percent change in economic growth. With oil prices down almost $30 over the past quarter, that would suggest a gain in economic growth of 0.6 percent—well above the costs incurred by slowing investment in the sector.

Overall, the drop in oil prices is an almost unmitigated win for the U.S. and for other countries that import substantial amounts of energy. For countries that export oil and whose government budgets depend on oil revenues, the reverse is true. We’ll talk about that tomorrow.


Subscribe via Email

New call-to-action
Crash-Test Investing

Hot Topics



New Call-to-action

Conversations

Archives

see all

Subscribe


Disclosure

The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

The VIX (CBOE Volatility Index) measures the market’s expectation of 30-day volatility across a wide range of S&P 500 options.

The forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio divides the current share price of the index by its estimated future earnings.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.

Member FINRASIPC

Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®