The Independent Market Observer

Is Hillary Clinton Going to Raise Capital Gains Taxes?

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA®, CFP®

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Jul 22, 2015 2:44:00 PM

and tagged In the News

Leave a comment

Hillary ClintonSeveral readers have reached out to me regarding news articles with headlines like “Clinton to Propose Increasing Capital Gains Taxes,” wanting to know the implications of this and what we should do.

First, let’s take a step back and think this through. A presidential candidate, who’s not guaranteed the nomination much less the election, has floated a trial balloon designed to please part of her base. If Hillary Clinton is eventually elected, she would actually have to make that proposal, convince her party to introduce it in Congress, and then hope that it’s enacted in the face of determined opposition from the other party, which will almost certainly control one of the two houses.

At that point, we might have a capital gains tax increase. Or, we might have something completely different. In any case, I’m not panicking just yet.

Washington’s role in the economy and markets

The headlines point to a larger issue, though: Washington’s influence on the economy and the markets. I’m not talking about the Federal Reserve here, but about the President and Congress.

Their power is largely negative. As we’ve seen over and over—the fiscal cliff being the most recent example—Washington has the power to damage both the economy and the markets. Taxation is one of the primary ways of doing that, and in this sense, worrying about possible capital gains tax increases makes perfect sense. Chief Justice John Marshall’s dictum that “the power to tax involves the power to destroy” is even more true now than it was in the early 1800s.

The greater the likelihood of significant policy changes—whether it’s higher taxes or more restrictive regulation—the more uncertainty will grow and the worse things will be for the markets and the economy. That's the real issue behind the headlines.

Let’s not get ahead of ourselves

In all likelihood, though, we will continue to have divided government. If Clinton were to be elected, she would face a Republican-dominated Congress that would constrain any left-leaning actions she proposed. Conversely, a President Clinton would be in a position to veto any right-leaning moves by the same Congress. Any proposal that actually got through would have to have substantial, bipartisan, centrist support to pass—not a bad thing.

We will certainly see more headlines like this one over the next year. But don’t get too concerned. It’s the nature of politicians to promise the sun, moon, and stars only to sober up after the election. I won’t be worrying too much about any proposals that aren’t introduced to Congress by elected officials, which means I won’t be worrying too much on that topic during the election cycle.

                      Subscribe to the Independent Market Observer            

Subscribe via Email

New call-to-action
Crash-Test Investing

Hot Topics

New Call-to-action



see all



The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

The VIX (CBOE Volatility Index) measures the market’s expectation of 30-day volatility across a wide range of S&P 500 options.

The forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio divides the current share price of the index by its estimated future earnings.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.


Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®