The Independent Market Observer

Back to the Basics on Stocks

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA, CAIA, MAI

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Oct 13, 2015 3:20:00 PM

and tagged Economics Lessons

Leave a comment

earningsThere are two components to stock markets: earnings and how much investors are willing to pay for them. Recently, much of the commentary has been on valuations, with the implicit assumption that earnings would more or less take care of themselves. Although this has been the case for the past several years, at least on a per-share basis, one of my colleagues and an investment research associate, Sam Millette, recently pulled some figures that gave me pause.

There are several interesting takeaways from the numbers in the chart below, but the one that jumps out at me is that earnings (gross, not per share) always have grown faster than revenues. At some level, this makes sense. Companies learn, become more efficient, invest in better equipment, control costs, and so forth. In a well-run and growing company, earnings should grow faster than revenues. The question is, by how much?

Index Category




S&P 500 revenue growth




S&P 500 earnings growth




Source: Bloomberg

A closer look at the data

Revenue growth. Looking at the data, revenue growth runs around 3.5 percent to 5 percent per year in all time periods, which is reasonably consistent with nominal GDP growth. Over time, revenues should be sustainable at these rates. Looking at specific time periods, though, there are differences. Revenues have grown slightly faster in the past five years, for example, than they have over longer time periods. This seems reasonable, as there’s no doubt that sales were depressed during the crisis and some of that is catch up. The numbers do suggest, however, that revenue growth might slow somewhat over the next several years.

Earnings growth. When we look at earnings, that narrow range and reasonable explanation seem a tougher fit to the recent data. Longer time periods show incremental earnings growth of between 1.70 percent and 2.34 percent—or about 6 percent based on an average sales growth rate of around 4 percent. Arguably, the 2000–2014 number is a better indicator, as it runs from a peak to a peak. But, leaving that aside, an extra 2.0 percent of earnings growth over revenue growth seems reasonable.

When we look at the most recent data, however, that increment of earnings growth over revenue growth has been more than 9 percent. It can certainly be argued that the depth of the collapse was such that we should see extra earnings growth in the aftermath, in line with the higher sales growth over that same time period. Given that argument, however, there is a problem: The math requires earnings growth to drop significantly over the next several years to make the averages come out even close for the full cycle. Success so far is probably a prescription for a significant slowdown soon.

Per-share numbers. And what if we consider the per-share numbers? One of the features of the past five years has been massive share buybacks, with companies reducing the number of outstanding shares and, consequently, increasing the per-share growth rates. It is surprisingly hard to quantify some of these effects, but I’m taking a look at it and hope to write about it soon.

The time is now

As we have seen, valuations certainly matter. But we are rapidly approaching a time when the earnings cycle will start to turn, and the fundamentals—the earnings—will take center stage again. Looking at the math, the act to come might be a lot more difficult for investors than the past one. The time to think about it is now.

                      Subscribe to the Independent Market Observer            

Subscribe via E-mail

New call-to-action
Crash-Test Investing
Commonwealth Independent Advisor

Hot Topics

New Call-to-action



see all



The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly into an index.

The MSCI EAFE Index (Europe, Australasia, Far East) is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.  

Third party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided at these websites. Information on such sites, including third party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.


Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®