The Independent Market Observer

11/19/13 – The Problem of Money, Part 6: Some Thoughts about Washington, DC

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA®, CFP®

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Nov 19, 2013 8:08:00 AM

and tagged Market Updates

Leave a comment

The photo below comes from an old B movie called Independence Day that I’ve always enjoyed. The plot is pretty simple: A race of space aliens shows up in orbit around the Earth and utterly destroys Washington, DC. Later on, though, it turns out the aliens are actually hostile.


(Pause for laughter.)

I’ve been using that joke off and on for a couple of years now when I talk about the government, and it always gets a laugh. It’s become clear that, while the Federal Reserve has done yeoman’s work in stabilizing and reviving the economy, the politicians in the White House and the Capitol have consistently failed to meet even minimum standards of effective governance.

I wrote some time ago about Scott Adams’s (of Dilbert fame) advocacy of an Anti-Incumbent Party. Briefly, when things are going badly, it tasks its members with pledging to vote against every single incumbent. I think the idea has a great deal of merit and am happy to mention it again.

Back to economics. The primary conclusion of yesterday’s post was that, because of Amazon’s commanding market position, unless the company repeatedly screws up its customer service over a long period, its primacy is pretty much assured for the indefinite future. With the U.S. in a similarly strong position as the default reserve currency, our management would have to do the same in order to lose that position. The problem is, while I find it almost impossible to imagine Jeff Bezos allowing this to happen, I don’t have to imagine the White House or Congress doing it—I have too many examples close at hand.

Let’s look forward though. What kind of errors would cause countries to abandon the U.S. dollar? The core requirements for reserve currency status, as discussed yesterday, are stability, investability, and portability. If the U.S. government called any of these into question, the threat to our reserve currency status would be immediate. Stability doesn’t seem to be a likely problem in the short term—although, if things get much worse in Washington, that’s an outside possibility. Portability also isn’t really seen as a threat, as capital controls would require much more political support than is available from either party.

That leaves investability, and this is the big one—the mechanism that could translate Washington’s dysfunction into a threat to the dollar.

One of the principal selling points for the dollar is that excess proceeds can be invested risk-free until they are needed. Sure, the returns aren’t great, but Treasury securities are risk-free. You can have trillions in Treasuries, as the Chinese do, and not worry because they are risk-free.

The reason I’ve italicized risk-free, of course, is that’s increasingly not perceived to be the case. When financial analysts build valuation models, they use Treasuries as a risk-free rate. When investors look for a safe investment, they use Treasuries. When foreign businesses hold capital, they are looking to minimize their risk.

The recent series of near defaults on the U.S. debt makes that risk-free status increasingly, well, risky. Prior to a couple of years ago, the notion of a real U.S. default was unimaginable. Now, people like me spend time imagining exactly that. We saw the real effect just recently when short-term interest rates on very short-term Treasuries went up by multiples on the perception that default was quite possible.

The rating agencies have responded by cutting U.S. debt ratings. The government has gone out of its way to intimidate them, however, so the cuts are probably not as much as the rating agencies would have liked. Foreign governments and businesses are also diversifying their holdings away from Treasuries. Remember, there is no economic reason why the U.S. would default, so the risk is exclusively political. Political risk, though, is also what the euro and the yuan face. By putting political risk in play for the dollar, it becomes all the more comparable to the euro and yuan—and makes a shift both easier to justify and more likely.

The tipping point on this will be when the perceived risk from Washington equals or exceeds the risks imposed by other political systems, such as those of the euro, yen, or yuan. When and if we hit that tipping point, there will be no stopping the shift away from the dollar. We have a long way to go until we get there, but we’ve taken the first steps down that road. Hopefully, we’ll step off it again, but that will ultimately be a political decision, not an economic one.

This series has been about the problem of money. The economic effects are real, but we have found that the problem of money is rooted in politics. Money as a societal and governmental structure is more political than economic. As an agent of commerce, money is a tool but not a driver. As an agent of society, money is inherently a political creation—and what politics creates, it can also destroy.

Subscribe via Email

New call-to-action
Crash-Test Investing

Hot Topics

New Call-to-action



see all



The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

The VIX (CBOE Volatility Index) measures the market’s expectation of 30-day volatility across a wide range of S&P 500 options.

The forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio divides the current share price of the index by its estimated future earnings.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.


Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®