The Independent Market Observer

9/30/13 – Here Comes the Shutdown

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA®, CFP®

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Sep 30, 2013 8:19:19 AM

and tagged Fiscal Cliff, Debt Crisis, Politics and the Economy

Leave a comment

Here we go again. I’ve written something to that effect several times over the past couple of years, what with the 2011 debt ceiling debate, the 2012 fiscal cliff, and now this. Governmental dysfunction has been normalized.

The phrase that comes to mind is “defining deviancy down,” from a 1993 paper by Daniel Patrick Moynihan, one of the great statesmen of American politics. The idea is similar to the boiled frog theory I described last month: with every ratchet down in behavior, the new low becomes somehow normal, and any subsequent changes are perceived as being less bad (compared with the new “normal”) than they would have been otherwise. Another way to describe it is a behavioral downward spiral—that is, behavior that formerly would have been thought absolutely disgraceful is now seen as somewhat embarrassing.

Which brings us to the shutdown. Assuming neither house of Congress wanted to go into the debt ceiling debate under the massive additional pressure of a government shutdown, I figured they’d cobble together a last-minute deal. That is certainly still possible, but both the House Republicans and Senate Democrats have used rhetoric and parliamentary procedure to make such a deal very unlikely. I think the betting now has to be that the government shuts down, which takes us into a debt ceiling debate that’s even nastier and more partisan than anyone expected.

The immediate consequences will be approximately 800,000 federal workers furloughed, suspension of “nonessential” federal services, and no pay for the remaining “essential” federal workers. “Essential” has some broad outlines, but military personnel, for example, may not get paid, and there is a great deal of uncertainty as to exactly what might happen. That uncertainty will be a key driver of the damage done to the economy.

The direct economic damage should be small, at least initially, limited to the loss of spending power by federal workers and the government itself. The direct effects over time would be similar to those of the sequester, and for similar reasons, but should occur mostly or solely within the period of the shutdown. Fourth-quarter GDP would be hurt, but there should be no direct effects beyond that—assuming the shutdown doesn’t extend past the end of the year.

The indirect effects are what should worry us. When we look at economic growth in the fourth quarter of last year, we see a big fat zero—largely caused by the political uncertainty generated by the fiscal cliff. When we combine the government shutdown and the risks associated with the pending debt ceiling, we have something even bigger than that. What’s worse, with the fiscal cliff, we had a worst-case solution in place—it was bad, but at least it was defined. Now, however, we have no idea how bad it could be. If the U.S. government were to default on its obligations, the long-term effects could start where the fiscal cliff stopped.

That said, I’m not worried about that outcome—yet. Even if we go past the debt ceiling, which appears increasingly likely, the Treasury can probably continue to manage the situation to minimize the damage. I acknowledge that this is another example of normalizing dysfunction, but, just as with the sequester spending cuts, the damage can most likely be contained for a while.

The immediate worry will be the effects of uncertainty on the U.S. economic recovery. We have a sustainable recovery under way, but it is still subject to external shocks, like the one about to start. A rerun of the fourth quarter of last year, where consumer spending and business investment tanked while citizens tried to figure out what Washington would do, is looking more and more likely. Taking growth back to zero would kill most of the economic momentum we now have.

Meanwhile, from a personal perspective, I have to prepare my quarterly review of the economy and the markets. In normal times, I would have written most of it last week. In less strange times, I could have finished it today. As it is, we will be down to the wire, and I’m waiting until tomorrow to write it, as I don’t really know how the month will end. Over to you, Messrs. Boehner and Reid.

Subscribe via Email

New call-to-action
Crash-Test Investing

Hot Topics

New Call-to-action



see all



The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

The VIX (CBOE Volatility Index) measures the market’s expectation of 30-day volatility across a wide range of S&P 500 options.

The forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio divides the current share price of the index by its estimated future earnings.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.


Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®