9/3/13 – Data Points That Really Mean Something: Housing

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA, CAIA, MAI

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Sep 3, 2013 11:10:02 AM

and tagged Market Updates

Leave a comment

I wrote Commonwealth’s monthly market update this morning, and one of the topics I covered was the slowdown in the housing recovery. To be sure, I think this is just a slowdown to a more sustainable level of growth, but looking at it made me think about what I really consider some of the best indicators for future economic performance.

As you know, consumer spending represents more than two-thirds of the economy as a whole, so the consumer is paramount when considering where we’re going. We have multiple surveys of consumer confidence, which remains at high levels, and many data points on how much consumers are spending, but each of these is subject to revision, massaging, assumptions, and everything else that goes into the economic-statistics sausage grinder. It can be tough to see anything through the fog. What we need are simpler, easier data points that reflect underlying consumer demand in a clearer way.

Two data points I’ve used during the past couple of years to call the timing and magnitude of the recovery have been housing sales and car sales. I believe these are the best indicators out there for several reasons. First, they represent significant capital investments. Anyone buying a house or car is making a multiyear commitment, and that requires much more thought and confidence than an impulse purchase. Second, they both tend to require third-party financing. Again, this is a significant, multiyear commitment on the part of the lender. Both of these purchases mean that someone and some lender feel good enough about the future to make that commitment.

Third, the timing of these purchases can be managed. You can always drive your old beater another year or renew your apartment lease, so changes in these figures mean something fundamental. Fourth, despite that, these sales reflect basic human needs, so we do have a baseline of demand that can act as a reference point.

The final reason I like these data points is that they reflect what people are actually doing. There is relatively little data massaging and few assumptions built in—people buy a car or house, or they don’t. By looking at what people are actually doing, you clear out most of the fog.

This is relevant because, with increases in mortgage rates and some signs of a slowdown in parts of the economy, the question of whether growth will continue or decline is a very real one. Just as they have over the past couple of years, I think these data points can offer useful perspective on the next 6 to 12 months.

First, let’s look at housing sales. I use existing home sales, as they represent the majority of transactions and are less constrained by other factors than new home sales.

090313_1

Looking at this chart, you can see that home sales are still increasing through July—and, in fact, at an increasing pace—suggesting that rising mortgage rates haven’t adversely impacted the actual number of transactions. You can also see that the volume of sales remains well below the peak, suggesting that demand—now at 2002 levels—is not being artificially juiced and is sustainable.

If you look at price, you see the same trend, but . . . prices seem to have gotten a bit ahead of sales, which suggests that we might see some softening on price increases, even while demand remains strong. This is consistent with the chart below, which shows changes in house prices—and which has recently declined. The question is whether house price appreciation will resume, driven by demand.

If we look at rents, per the following chart, we get more relevant information about that. We can see that changes in rents generally are consistent with changes in prices, which makes intuitive sense. Most recently, though, when we see a decrease in the rate of housing price increases, it’s matched with an increase in rental rate growth—suggesting that housing price increases may resume. This would certainly make sense based on the above chart, as prices appear to have gotten ahead of themselves. A period of stability or slower growth will allow prices to catch up with demand, but continued demand should then push prices higher.

090313_2

Overall, the housing market data suggests that, while recent price increases have slowed, the underlying demand remains strong and price increases may resume—both of which would be good for the economy. It suggests that consumers remain confident enough to keep buying homes, even though that involves a multiyear commitment, and that lenders remain confident enough in the market to allow them to do so.

Based on all of this, the underlying data for housing indicates that the consumer-led recovery remains on track. I’m running out of space here, so we’ll look at car sales tomorrow.

Upcoming Appearances

Tune in to Bloomberg Radio's Bloomberg Businessweek on Friday, February 28, at 3:45 P.M. ET to hear Brad talk about the market. Stream the show live at https://www.bloombergradio.com/, listen through SiriusXM 119, or download Bloomberg's app, Bloomberg Radio+.

Tune into Yahoo Finance's The Final Round on Thursday, March 12, between 2:50 and 4:00 P.M. ET to hear Brad talk about the market. Exact interview time will be updated once confirmed. Watch at finance.yahoo.com

Subscribe via E-mail

New call-to-action
Crash-Test Investing
Commonwealth Independent Advisor

Hot Topics

Have a Question?

New Call-to-action

Conversations

Archives

see all

Subscribe

Disclosure

The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly into an index.

The MSCI EAFE Index (Europe, Australasia, Far East) is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.  

Third party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided at these websites. Information on such sites, including third party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.

Member FINRASIPC

Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®