The Independent Market Observer

6/5/13 – U.S. Treasury Refinancing Risks

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA®, CFP®

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Jun 5, 2013 10:05:21 AM

and tagged Market Updates

Leave a comment

As of the end of 2012, the average maturity of U.S. debt was around five years—65 months to be exact—up considerably from the October 2008 trough, and the longest average maturity in a decade, according to the Wall Street Journal. The Treasury intends to continue extending the maturity, with a goal of around 80 months in 2022.


Why? With shorter-term bonds costing less than longer-term bonds, why not just keep the average maturity as short as possible to minimize debt service costs? The short answer is that the Treasury is planning for the time, which could be reasonably soon, when the Fed stops buying bonds in order to push yields down. The longer the average maturity of the debt, the less the immediate refinancing risk when rates start to rise.

You can compare this to a five-year adjustable-rate mortgage. If you expect rates to rise, you want to lock in your costs for as long as you can. We know rates will rise at some point, so it makes sense to lock in current low costs as far into the future as possible.

To quantify this a bit, as of May 10, 2013, Treasury bond rates stood at 11 basis points for the 1-year, 82 bps for the 5-year, and 190 bps for the 10-year; extending the maturity from 5 years to 10 would cost about another 1 percent. If interest rates for the 5-year and 10-year Treasuries were to increase back to their averages over the past 10 years (266 bps for the 5-year and 348 bps for the 10-year—which are still artificially low, since they include the last 3 years), we would be paying 1 percent to save a potential 1.5 percent. Sticker shock is another factor: 1-year rates would increase by over 15 times (to 176 bps), 5-year rates would more than triple, and 10-year rates would just less than double. We would also face the question of demand shortage as we continuously rolled over short-term debt. Given the demand issue and the potential for payment shock, it makes sense to extend the maturity as much as possible.

Another, less-obvious benefit is that longer terms allow inflation to erode the real value of the debt. As the Fed has explicitly stated that it will create inflation, shorter-term debt would have to be refinanced more quickly—leaving less time for inflation to erode its real value. Longer-term debt allows more time for that to occur. At an inflation rate of 2 percent per year, a 10-year bond would lose 20 percent of its real value over the term. With trillions in overall debt, that’s not trivial.

Looking at the chart below, we see privately held public debt decreasing in maturity while the overall debt maturity increases. Why could that be? Well, with the Fed just rebating interest paid to the Treasury, it’s essentially free debt. Moreover, the Fed won’t be dumping its holdings if interest rates rise, and it will squawk much less at the losses from rising rates. 060513_2

In fact, it almost looks as if the Treasury and the Fed are setting up a situation in which the Fed will be able to support a rising level of inflation (and consequent erosion of the real value of the debt) simply by sitting on its holdings, while lessening the effect on other aspects of government finance.

Although I’m not sure about this and want to think it through some more, it does seem that this could be a setup for the Fed exit that would minimize larger economic damage. If so, it’s a very clever strategy.

Subscribe via Email

New call-to-action
Crash-Test Investing

Hot Topics

New Call-to-action



see all



The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

The VIX (CBOE Volatility Index) measures the market’s expectation of 30-day volatility across a wide range of S&P 500 options.

The forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio divides the current share price of the index by its estimated future earnings.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.


Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®