The Independent Market Observer

6/3/13 – Newsflash: We Are at War—And Have Been for Some Time

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA®, CFP®

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Jun 3, 2013 7:55:04 AM

and tagged Market Updates

Leave a comment

One of the questions I’ve been getting lately has been about rising geopolitical tensions and what that means for investing. Recently, the focus has been on North Korea, but, with the Israeli strikes in Syria, that should be coming up as a topic soon.

My usual response, which isn’t meant to be flip, is that I’d be more worried if things were quiet. If they’re making noise, we at least kind of know what they’re thinking.

The reason I say that is, given the wide range of U.S. interests—and the need of many governments to visibly oppose the U.S. for domestic political purposes (North Korea, Iran, Afghanistan, Russia, France, among others)—you have to bank on a certain amount of noise. Wrap in the game-theoretic reasons for many of these powers to sound as bellicose as possible, and a higher level of noise is not only understandable but desirable: it says they are acting as expected.

I therefore tend to discount much of the noise, getting excited only if something unusual comes along. North Korea’s threats don’t qualify, nor does Israel bombing Syria—although both of those certainly have the potential to become more important issues.

Instead, I try to focus on threats that are real but less reported. For instance, I’ve made a big deal about the coming clash of China and its neighbors, particularly Japan, in the seas of Southeast Asia. This is something that will affect oil markets and world trade, and it’s being driven not by a desire to make noise but by fundamental resource and trade conflicts that have triggered regional and global wars in the past. I have also focused on the growing gap between France and Germany. If the euro were to melt down, especially because of a fundamental break between those two powers, we could move right back to the nineteenth century. At this point, I don’t expect that to happen, but it is a worry.

My other areas of focus are wars that are currently under way, such as our war on Iran. Didn’t know about that? It hasn’t been declared, but just because we aren’t sending in kinetic platforms doesn’t mean we’re not at war. Consider the Stuxnet virus that crippled the Iranian uranium enrichment program and the economic sanctions that have impaired its currency and trade.

The other war we are engaged in is cyberwar with China. The Pentagon recently acknowledged that the Chinese military is behind many of the cyberattacks on the U.S., which is hardly a surprise, given the Mandiant report. What is surprising is the acknowledgement. That this is now in the public eye—on the front page of the New York Times, no less—suggests that the government wants a discussion of cyberwar and how we are already engaged. As I mentioned, we are also at cyberwar with Iran, and we (or Israel—the attribution is unclear) seem to have made the first strike.

Arguably, yet another war is the currency war, a set of economic conflicts that could certainly escalate. I will have a lot more to say about that in a future post.

The fact that we are already actively engaged in these very real but nonmilitary conflicts—as well as others explicitly identified as wars (such as Afghanistan) and others (like Syria and Libya) where we no doubt have special forces—combines with the usual noise level to reduce my sensitivity.

As with the stock market, daily noise can and does obscure important underlying trends, cyber and economic war being the two most important. Even though they are moving into the public eye, they are still worth far more attention than most people give them.

Subscribe via Email

New call-to-action
Crash-Test Investing

Hot Topics

New Call-to-action



see all



The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

The VIX (CBOE Volatility Index) measures the market’s expectation of 30-day volatility across a wide range of S&P 500 options.

The forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio divides the current share price of the index by its estimated future earnings.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.


Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®