The Independent Market Observer

12/13/12 - Santa Is Real After All—Up to a Point

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA®, CFP®

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Dec 13, 2012 11:28:52 AM

and tagged Fiscal Cliff, Politics and the Economy

Leave a comment

So the big story today is that the Federal Reserve is now explicitly linking its interest rates to U.S. unemployment. It’s kind of the reverse of the Santa revelation. Remember when you found out that Santa wasn’t real? How you kind of knew it but weren’t happy to have it confirmed? Now we kind of knew that the Fed was keying on unemployment, but again we’re not all that happy to have it confirmed.

The story made the front pages of the Financial Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the New York Times, in all cases above the fold. So in the eyes of the mainstream—and especially the financial—media, this is a big deal. I agree, for a change. The Fed has explicitly moved toward supporting the real economy, in employment, and away from supporting the financial economy, with inflation. Clearly, it is worried more about the former than the latter.

The Fed has a dual mandate: price stability and employment. In normal times, price stability gets most of the attention, but over the past several years the Fed has clearly abandoned any anti-inflation worries. In fact, it has tried to create inflation in order to fend off the threat of deflation.

Creating inflation sounds like the worst sort of heresy for a central bank, but in fact deflation can be worse. Inflation benefits borrowers—whose debt remains constant—even as the dollars used to pay it back become cheaper. In strict moderation, inflation can be seen as a positive factor. We also understand how to fix inflation problems.

Deflation, on the other hand, benefits creditors, as the debt balance remains the same but must be paid back in dollars that are worth more, making it harder. In an over-indebted economy like ours, deflation would make any recovery that much more difficult. We also do not understand how to fix a deflation problem—something with which Japan has struggled for decades.

So the Fed is definitely aiming to create inflation rather than deflation—and is well aware that it might have to clean up the mess later—to avoid something worse. Fortunately, this coincides with the other half of its dual mandate, which is to maintain employment levels.

In order to suppress interest rate levels, the Fed will continue its quantitative easing operations, injecting money into the economy through purchases of Treasury and mortgage bonds with the intention of keeping borrowing cheap and forcing investors to invest in riskier assets to generate income. It is doing this because it is scared of continued weakness and especially of the fiscal cliff. Bernanke, who coined the term, has explicitly stated that the Fed cannot make up for the effects of the fiscal cliff, should Congress not act.

We are now approaching the end of the Fed’s abilities. It is buying a large proportion of the bonds available in the market, so it has very little room to expand that effort. It has extended the support indefinitely, so it has no room to go further. And, although I am sure that there are further contingency plans, the Fed is getting further and further away from what has historically been a central bank’s role. At some point, it will hit a limit. At the end of the day, even Santa may have to say, “Enough.”

Subscribe via Email

New call-to-action
Crash-Test Investing

Hot Topics

New Call-to-action



see all



The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

The VIX (CBOE Volatility Index) measures the market’s expectation of 30-day volatility across a wide range of S&P 500 options.

The forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio divides the current share price of the index by its estimated future earnings.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.


Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®