The Independent Market Observer

10/31/12 – The Hurricane and the Election

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA, CAIA, MAI

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Oct 31, 2012 11:07:49 AM

and tagged Politics and the Economy

Leave a comment

The hurricane has muddied a lot of waters but, surprisingly, may have helped to clear those around the election. Post-Sandy, Intrade continues to have President Obama as almost a two-to-one favorite, 65 to 35, and Nate Silver has him as more than a three-to-one favorite, at 77 to 22. Not all of the models call it for Obama, though. A recent political science paper I looked at reviewed 12 different political prediction models, with the models split evenly down the middle, 6 each.

Although I believe the numbers are closer than they seem, I do expect Obama to win. First, I think Hurricane Sandy has really reminded voters in a very concrete way of the role of the federal government, which is easy to criticize in the abstract but less so in the immediate presence of flooding. The change of focus from the problems of government to the active role of government successfully makes many of Obama’s points for him. As far as October surprises go, Sandy really is a surprise, at least politically.

The second reason I suspect Obama will win is in the bet hedging that has happened over the past 24 hours. Chris Christie, governor of New Jersey and significant Romney surrogate, has gone overboard saying how great the President has been in his Sandy response. Now, either Christie is saying these things without thinking of the political implications—doubtful—or he is doing so deliberately. If so, why? Perhaps because he thinks he’ll be dealing with Obama for the next four years, and the time to get right is now.

The other notable bet hedging has been by the heads of the major U.S. auto companies, who attacked one of Romney’s ads that accused Chrysler of planning to move Jeep production to China. This got wide notice and was written up in the Financial Times under the headline “Auto chiefs accuse Romney over Jeep ad” and in the New York Times (NYT) with “2 American Automakers Rebut Claims by Romney.” Again, either the heads of two major corporations decided to stick a finger in the eye of the next president, or they think that is not much of a risk.

The final major reason I expect Obama to win is the changing economic narrative. Housing continues to improve, per “Home Prices Climb Across Country” on page A2 of the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) and “Nation’s Home Prices Rose 2% in August” on page B9 of the NYT. Housing is foundational, but other components are showing strength as well, notably autos. “US Drives Ford Profit” (WSJ, page B2) focuses on how Ford has streamlined its operations, but the underlying point is that auto sales are up almost 20 percent year-to-date. Both houses and cars are long-term, big-ticket purchases that require significant financing. They don’t happen without confidence in the future, and the fact that both are up suggests confidence is on its way back, which can only be good for the incumbent.

Overall, we still have a horse race, but Sandy has helped to clarify some issues in ways that will probably help Obama. We don’t really know, as the storm limited polling, but we will find out shortly.

Happy Halloween!

Subscribe via Email

Crash-Test Investing

Hot Topics

New Call-to-action



see all



The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.


Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®