The Independent Market Observer

Bad News from Libya, But Good News from Europe

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA, CAIA, MAI

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Sep 13, 2012 6:15:09 AM

and tagged Politics and the Economy

Leave a comment

Unfortunately, the headline story today on front pages everywhere was the murder of the U.S. ambassador and three of his team in Libya. The Financial Times (FT) led with “Marines sent to Libya after envoy is killed in mob attack on US consulate,” the New York Times (NYT) had “Attack on US Site In Libya Kills Envoy; A Flash Point for Obama and Romney,” and the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) had “Libya Attack Sparks Crisis.” My thoughts and prayers to the families of the victims—there is not a lot else to say.

Economics got pushed to the back pages. The decision by the German court to approve Germany’s participation in the European rescue fund was on page 3 of the FT, with “Constitutional court refuse to block creation of rescue fund.” Meanwhile “In Victory for Merkel, German Court Ruling Favors European Bailout Fund” appeared on page 6 of the NYT, and “German Court Clears Rescue Fund” appeared on page 10 of the WSJ. This is a major victory for the euro, as not only was the rescue fund approved, but the language used made it more difficult for future challenges to be filed, and the conditions imposed were less than had been feared.

The other potential risk, the Dutch elections, also went in favor of the euro. The NYT had “Support for the Euro Is Seen in Dutch Election Results” (p. A15), and the WSJ had “Dutch Vote Shows Pro-Europe Trend” (p. A11). Two major uncertainties have been removed from the euro’s path, and I have to say I am encouraged. The war is not over, but two major battles have been won.

The reason the war is not over is that the problems remain. Budgets have not been balanced and necessary cuts and changes have not been made. The steps taken provide the tools to make solving those problems less painful than it would otherwise be, but the problems still need to be solved.

The European Union is well aware of this, of course, and is already trying to use the momentum to take the next steps. “Barroso calls for EU federation” in the FT (p. 3) and “EU Chief Calls ‘Federation’ the Way Forward for Bloc” in the WSJ (p. A10) show that the next battle has already been launched. Let’s see how the rest of the war goes.

The news in the U.S. was not as good. The FT had “US median income lowest since 1995” (p. 6), the NYT had “US Income Gap Rose, Sign of Uneven Recovery” (p. A19), and the WSJ had a trifecta—“Household Incomes Sink to ’95 Level” (p. 1), “Executives Press Washington to ‘Fix the Debt’” (p. A6), and “Economists Are Uncertain More Fed Moves Will Work” (p. A7). The slowing U.S. economy continues to frustrate attempts to juice it.

Two more stories worth noting. The first, which made all the papers, was the release of the iPhone 5. Rah. Looks like a neat gadget, and I really like my iPhone 4S, but at the end of the day it’s a phone. Evolution, not revolution. The other is the Fed’s implementation of QE3. The markets loved it, and we will be discussing it more tomorrow. Briefly, the Fed has essentially signed on to continue stimulus as long as necessary—a big change, and one that may be intended to be consistent with European Central Bank policy. More on this tomorrow, but this is further confirmation that Washington, DC, is now the financial capital, not New York.

Have a great day!

Subscribe via Email

Crash-Test Investing

Hot Topics

New Call-to-action



see all



The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.


Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®