The Independent Market Observer

Changes

Posted by Brad McMillan, CFA®, CFP®

Find me on:

This entry was posted on Jun 26, 2012 9:35:37 AM

and tagged Market Updates

Leave a comment

I am a big fan of the Lord of the Rings movies. I would love to embed Cate Blanchett’s witchy Galadriel voice, saying at the start, “The world had changed,” because we are seeing this more and more in the news and in how we look at the world.

I put together a presentation a couple of months ago that talked first about the U.S. economy and then about how it fit into the world and what that meant for our future. As I developed it, I realized that there was actually a consistent narrative that went beyond the U.S. and economics. Simply stated, the primacy of economics and markets as an organizing principle was rapidly eroding and returning to a much more mixed environment of politics, geography (broadly defined), and economics. I will get into this some more tomorrow, including posting a copy of that presentation, but today I want to make a related but different point about how our perception of the world has changed—and how that will affect how we live going forward.

The world has changed even from what it was five years ago, in 2007. Perceptions, and the decisions they drive, have changed even more. Markets are no longer as trusted as they were then. Beyond the lack of trust, or maybe because of it, prosperity is no longer assumed. The financial crises—note the plural—have made voters realize that perhaps things never were as good as they had thought. As the tide of liquidity recedes, the limits of what can be done with real resources are being realized. As those limits start to bite, we are being forced to renegotiate deals that many thought had been settled.

This is showing up at many levels. Greece is the poster child for hitting the fiscal wall. France is trying to deny the problem by electing a Socialist government that will spend more, but they don’t have the money. Lest we get too smug here in the U.S., we had a well-publicized recall election in Wisconsin that was going to roll back public spending cuts—but it failed. In today’s Wall Street Journal, the OpEd page talks about a similar situation in Idaho, where limits to collective bargaining that were passed by the legislature are now the targets of repeal referenda.

This is only the beginning, as the fight begins for the same-sized piece of a smaller pie. The obvious targets are not the only ones, either. As resources diminish, more problems and constraints will emerge that we don’t see today. In today’s New York Times, for example, an article outlines an emerging problem where municipalities have guaranteed the debt of independent authorities. As these authorities and their projects run into trouble, taxpayers are now on the hook. Pension fund funding problems, endemic in the public and private worlds, are additional versions of the same problem: promises made in good times that can’t—and won’t—be kept in bad times.

One of my favorite economics quotations is the line “If something can’t continue, it won’t,” by Herb Stein. We are now realizing that many of the plans and promises we made can’t continue—so they won’t. Getting from here to there is going to be the story of the next 10 years, and it will dramatically affect the way all levels of government operate. More on that tomorrow.


Subscribe via Email

New call-to-action
Crash-Test Investing

Hot Topics



New Call-to-action

Conversations

Archives

see all

Subscribe


Disclosure

The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.

Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.

The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly in an index.

The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.

One basis point (bp) is equal to 1/100th of 1 percent, or 0.01 percent.

The VIX (CBOE Volatility Index) measures the market’s expectation of 30-day volatility across a wide range of S&P 500 options.

The forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio divides the current share price of the index by its estimated future earnings.

Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided on these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.

Member FINRASIPC

Please review our Terms of Use

Commonwealth Financial Network®