The Independent Market Observer | Outlook. Opinion. Insight.

The Return of Diversification?

Written by Brad McMillan, CFA®, CFP® | Oct 4, 2016 9:16:27 PM

Writing my quarterly update the past couple of days, something occurred to me: international markets are beating U.S. markets for the first time in a while. This is big news, given that U.S. markets have dominated, unusually, for the past couple of years. Also noteworthy is that most asset classes are actually making money for the year—again, something we haven’t seen in a while.

After a few down years, is diversification making a comeback?

I last wrote about this in May, looking back at 2015 and 2014. The title of the piece—“Why Are My Investments Doing Badly?”—pretty much says it all. The reason, in both years, was that only one asset class did well (large-cap U.S. stocks, as represented by the S&P 500), while others did either much less well or poorly. For diversified investors, who were lagging the S&P 500, it looked like the only appropriate solution was to dump everything else and invest only in that.

Financial markets appear to be normalizing

In fact, for eight of the past ten years, that would have been a mistake, but it sure looked good if you only considered the past two years. Now, it seems like financial markets are finally normalizing and diversification may be rewarded.

Looking at the third quarter, for example:

  • The S&P 500 is up 3.85 percent.
  • International developed markets, as represented by the MSCI EAFE Index, are up 6.43 percent.
  • The MSCI Emerging Markets Index is up 9.15 percent.

You would have left money on the table by overweighting the S&P 500. Here in the U.S., the S&P was outperformed by the Nasdaq, up 10.02 percent, and even by the high-yield sector of the bond market, with the Barclays U.S. Corporate High Yield Index gaining 5.55 percent.

Last year was a bad year across the board, and 2014 wasn’t much better. 2016 is, so far at least, much better in almost every respect. After two abnormal years, markets are normalizing. After two bad years, price levels are low enough to allow for appreciation. After two years of weak economics, fundamentals improved. After two bad years, markets are potentially due for a good one.

Lessons learned

Here's what we can take away from the past couple of years:

  • First, markets can act abnormally for a long time. In this case, it was more than two years.
  • Second, just about the time you decide to do something different, normality is likely to reassert itself.
  • Third, even difficult times eventually end. A diversified portfolio is doing much better this year than it did for the last two, and that is likely to continue.

This is, obviously, good news. The normalization of the markets suggests that much of the world is returning to economic normalcy, just as the U.S. has. Second, it seems that market pricing is returning in many areas to fundamentals. Normality is something investors have been seeking ever since the crisis, and after a couple of bad years, financial markets may be returning there.

Of course, normal also implies volatility and that different asset classes will act differently. In other words, normal implies that diversification still makes sense. Meet the new portfolio, same as the old portfolio.